- 21. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m contest and DX Window? (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:57:07 -0500
- Indeed. The alternative contest is called the CQ 160, and has different rules, and does NOT have the DX window. Is there some reason why we would want all contests with the same rules? And then there
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00010.html (9,329 bytes)
- 22. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m contest and DX Window? (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 12:09:33 -0500
- The DX window is a nearly completely obsolete concept for contests, now rejected by every contest sponsor except ARRL. The ARRL Contest Advisory Committee (CAC) in writing recommended discontinuing t
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00068.html (14,294 bytes)
- 23. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:15:07 -0500
- Concerning voltage breakdowns using yagi-loaded towers on 160 meters... I have heard stories of arcing to beat the band, that included a fair amount of destruction. I have heard stories of nothing ne
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00309.html (10,690 bytes)
- 24. Re: Topband: Confusion in ON4UN's Low Band DXing radial length calculations. (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:45:58 -0500
- An awful lot of our advice depends on unnoticed assumptions based in the commercial BC paradigm. Go to any place where there is a commercial AM BC tower. Figure out a one wavelength radius circle aro
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00324.html (11,953 bytes)
- 25. Re: Topband: V55V in SP (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:36:43 -0500
- I worked Rick at 03:21 from NC. He called me while I was running. His signal was much louder than many eastern US stations. What is interesting is that here the big 3/8 wave L over FCP is mostly on t
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00450.html (11,082 bytes)
- 26. Topband: SP conditions from super-station (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:54:59 -0500
- W3LPL is the only station I know of that has worked a major DX test accomplishing five-band DXCC 160m through 15. Frank has an exceptional station for 160m. N3QE, an excellent op, operated W3LPL for
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00469.html (7,219 bytes)
- 27. Re: Topband: Beverage on Ice (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:38:24 -0500
- I think I would take insulated Flexweave to make an "Ice-BOG". I would use one of these Lithium-Ion hand held circular saws, with the depth of the saw set to a quarter inch, or whatever depth you thi
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00090.html (10,730 bytes)
- 28. Re: Topband: Beverage on Ice (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:58:49 -0500
- Using FlexWeave and insulation is a take-off on the kind of wire that they put down in the slices in pavement for sensor loops. The insulation also serves as mechanical protection, and the flexible c
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00092.html (8,335 bytes)
- 29. Re: Topband: Beverage on Ice (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:27:18 -0500
- The 1000 feet of wire trenched in ice was doomed from the start. 160m BOG's longer than 220 feet start to not model well, and start to not perform well. One can easily model a BOG that has a pattern
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00104.html (12,621 bytes)
- 30. Re: Topband: Is it just me? (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:15:31 -0500
- Worked NE at 07:47 (Sat Z), so there is at least one. He was calling CQ at the time. 73, Guy K2AV _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00216.html (7,535 bytes)
- 31. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:51:41 -0500
- When I send in a checklog, that does not invalidate QSOs where other stations were working me. They get credit. If I checklog, I'm just saying that *I* am not submitting a log to put *my* call into t
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00257.html (9,663 bytes)
- 32. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:39:07 -0500
- My question is why penalize the bloke on the innocent end of the QSO. He didn't do anything wrong. Would your rule apply to a station running 1600 watts instead of 1500. Or 1500 watts instead of 100?
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00298.html (10,952 bytes)
- 33. Re: Topband: NE7D loaded tower (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:28:42 -0500
- The Zulu date and time. Only way to stay sane. Besides, think Cabrillo requires GMT. 73, Guy K2AV _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00324.html (8,631 bytes)
- 34. Re: Topband: Inverted L question (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 18:52:16 -0500
- The most important part of an inverted L is the counterpoise, be it raised radials, buried or on-ground radials or an FCP. Be sure you can do a counterpoise well. Otherwise the counterpoise can be a
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00048.html (8,482 bytes)
- 35. Re: Topband: HC1PF Luis on TB (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:04:07 -0500
- Hi Rune, Yes, we are copying Luis in the US rather well. He has the usual RX problems of listening to the US stations in their winter while he has summer and the local QRN. He also has nearby BC stat
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00487.html (8,162 bytes)
- 36. Re: Topband: HC1PF on TB Tuesday 17th February 2015 (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:19:27 -0500
- Luis HC1PF is constructing and trying out various solutions to his RX noise, and is very much aware that he is TX much better than RX. He has a unique situation I can't get into, but he definitely ha
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00506.html (11,335 bytes)
- 37. Re: Topband: Modeling a BOG (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:40:09 -0500
- Amen. So-called "natural laws" depend on finding a mathematical way to generate what is actually measured. Then the Math is called a "law". Since all math is a model, model-that-matches-real-so-far i
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00583.html (10,551 bytes)
- 38. Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:38:34 -0500
- The difference between the acoustic stuff and HF, MF antenna modeling, is that there is BIG money to be made with acoustics. Someone can invest serious capital in the research with a halfway decent h
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00585.html (9,484 bytes)
- 39. Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:06:35 -0500
- You wish. You're not considering the situation that everyone is complaining about. NEC x.x does not provide accurate answers for "UNDERkill" radial systems either. I've never heard of a skilled ham g
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00604.html (10,615 bytes)
- 40. Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:49:18 -0500
- Which decidedly makes it an approximation in real terms. And yes it IS tuned, read the program code. And note how the FCC specifies determination of the NEC ground constants to use. 73, Guy _________
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00606.html (7,662 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu