Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1fz@myfairpoint.net: 500 ]

Total 500 documents matching your query.

261. Topband: over confident (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:06:01 -0500
   Worked EP6T last night, well sort of,...errr.. thought I did. He came right back after I gave my call once on a new transmit frequency.. I heard loud static crash, dah, qrm, 1FZ . I went back with
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00196.html (8,025 bytes)

262. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:41:09 -0500
Could someone in the future, set up a internet controlled remote in an extremely rare country? Then make a contact with himself for a new one?  How far will  all this stretch to ? ....     (((:>)) As
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00327.html (13,060 bytes)

263. Topband: Fwd: Re: BoGs, BaGs and BuGs (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:50:45 -0500
500 feet is too long for a low band BOG unless sitting upon an insulating earth like sand. For info see   www.qsl.net/k1fz/ bogantennanotes/index.html 73 Bruce-K1FZ   -- End forwarded message --   __
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00386.html (8,111 bytes)

264. Topband: : Re: BoGs, BaGs and BuGs (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:52:50 -0500
500 feet is too long for a low band BOG unless sitting upon an insulating earth like sand. For info see   www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html 73 Bruce-K1FZ   -- End forwarded message --   ___
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00387.html (7,891 bytes)

265. Re: Topband: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:53:29 -0500
Low band hams are very aware of "sea gain" minimum salt water attenuation at low angles. The signal will not  produce a perfect circle as the posting shows. 73 Bruce-K1FZ www.qsl.net/k1fz/beveragenot
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00406.html (9,863 bytes)

266. Topband: Fwd: Re: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:41:07 -0500
Better, these look more like measured signal levels, The sky wave plot looks like a use of a drafting compass.  Actual measurements would reflect slight aircraft measurement irregularities. Thanks fo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00418.html (8,059 bytes)

267. Re: Topband: Beverage guidance needed (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:10:39 -0500
Through the woods is ok. No cutting needed.  If above ground,  580-600 length is good. If BOG, 200 feet is optimum length for 160 meters in most locations. If off ground, need to be high enough to pr
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00427.html (9,168 bytes)

268. Topband: TI9/3Z9DX (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:26:30 -0500
 Ti9/3Z9DX initially was very weak on 160 last night at my QTH in Maine (northern New England). Then the signal started building, peaking to S-8  1530 hours UTC. Unfortunately they were working Europ
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00535.html (7,497 bytes)

269. Re: Topband: Modeling a BOG (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:17:36 -0500
A few years ago when I started playing around with BOG antennas, I buried a 160 foot length  existing BOG  2 to 6 inches.  I lost more than 6 DB on 160 meters. On 80 meters signals went WAY down. I d
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00580.html (11,491 bytes)

270. Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:38:13 -0500
Agree with Tom I found that the 160 foot BOG antenna that was buried was more  unstable with dry/rain conditions, than when on/above ground. Also the 1/8 wave spaced  160 meter 4 square, I had some y
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00594.html (8,104 bytes)

271. Re: Topband: TI9/3Z9DX (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:31:10 -0500
Mike. I emailed Dom asking for a 160 meter, time specific, North America standby.  On  02/22/2015 they were on working mixed instead of just Europe.  The opening to Northern New England was only abou
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00599.html (8,729 bytes)

272. Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:42:49 -0500
Earth resistance/voltage would not necessarily be exactly the same for each radial, depending upon the earth site.. If memory serves me correctly, think it was W7EL who found standing waves on some r
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00618.html (8,723 bytes)

273. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:02:37 -0500
Most of us are creatures of habit. I Didn't like the change over to SSB, New WARC bands, computer tuned Radios. It goes on and on.  Wonder if the Spark transmitter guys  wanted to keep the smell of O
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00631.html (9,392 bytes)

274. Re: Topband: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:40:14 -0500
True the lower velocity factor does bring the frequency down lower with snow & leaves. In my case found that 215 feet may be best in the dry month in summer, 200 feet is best on 160 meters year aroun
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00706.html (11,513 bytes)

275. Topband: Fwd: Re: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:12:44 -0500
I can believe this. If you think of earth as also capacitance to the wire,  the optimum  frequency would go much lower. Using radial wire grounds instead of deep ground rods, become part of the probl
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00710.html (7,879 bytes)

276. Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used WithVertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:08:31 -0400
        That part of the property   >   Agree with your posting Guy. My first 100 foot vertical was to become a two band 4 square. I initially laid out 16 equal radials. Measuring the currents with a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00044.html (10,364 bytes)

277. Topband: How's propagation ? (score: 1)
Author: "k1fz" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:10:53 -0500
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mms/index.html#.VQSgjI7WVIg 73 Bruce-K1FZ www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00057.html (6,825 bytes)

278. Topband: Fw: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: "k1fz" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:12:00 -0500
Ham radio, like life in general, is evolving. With a lot of technology change, it's a good time to breath some fresh air and let it jell out. E30FB did work a few NA, but only on signal peaks. Other
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00138.html (7,977 bytes)

279. Re: Topband: reverseable bev (score: 1)
Author: "k1fz" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:50:12 -0500
Beverage antennas are low impedance antennas, the coax cable to an isolated antenna transformer is not normally a problem especially if buried under the soil 73 Bruce-K1FZ www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00176.html (7,351 bytes)

280. Topband: Fw: reverseable bev (score: 1)
Author: "k1fz" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:01:45 -0500
Beverage antennas are low impedance antennas, the coax cable to an isolated antenna transformer is not normally a problem especially if buried under the soil 73 Bruce-K1FZ www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00177.html (6,653 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu