Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gswynar@durham.net: 213 ]

Total 213 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Radial length (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:07:51 -0500
On Thursday 30th November Peter wrote... 'round the back of the garage, then spread their ends out on the other side, would that be effective or a waste of copper? Hi Peter et al, Back in December 19
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00224.html (8,701 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: INVERTED_L_ANTENNA_MATCHING (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:11:10 -0500
On 3rd December George wrote... antenna? The antenna is 120 feet on the horizontal and 50 feet on the vertical. George, You have the classic Stew Perry (W1BB) extended inverted "L" there...! I had th
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00024.html (8,080 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: Effect of Trees (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 16:21:16 -0500
On 3rd December Mike wrote... Hi Mike, It always astounds me how we all seem to harbour deep dark suspicions in the matter of placing vertical antennas near trees (non-conductors), yet we don't hesit
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00025.html (8,251 bytes)

64. Re: Topband: Effects of trees (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:10:41 -0500
On 4th December Tom wrote... (compared to a steel or metal structure) it probably isn't helpful. Hi Guys, Well, now I really AM confused...! Do I understand it correctly that it's far, far better sit
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00042.html (8,309 bytes)

65. Topband: General Conditions (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:23:08 -0500
Good Day All, I thought that the seemingly continuous stretch of poor conditions on the band this year were a product of my imagination & impatience...until I took a look at my log book for this same
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00140.html (7,291 bytes)

66. Topband: Low Band Contest Software (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:35:08 -0500
Greetings All From The Jurassic Era...! I've a yen to try my hand at the upcoming Stew Perry 160 event, but somewhere/somehow, evolution has passed me by, & just like dinosaurs at Jurassic Park, I've
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00221.html (7,827 bytes)

67. Topband: Computerized Contest Logging (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:55:22 -0500
Good Day All, I'm curious as to the "...general feeling" of any & all active & sem-active contestors who might be reading this, regarding the matter of computerized logging... Specifically, does EVER
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00308.html (8,383 bytes)

68. Topband: Compuerized Contest Logging --- EPILOGUE (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:06:26 -0500
Wow...! It sure is interesting to see all the many different software packages favoured by different Hams in support of their contesting activities. It was eye-opening to see the width & breadth of w
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00323.html (8,873 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: Models and the real world (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:34:50 -0500
On 30th December Tom (W8JI) wrote... actually building and measuring what they model. We are becoming a world of modelers where the little box on the desk gives us a false sense of physical reality.
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00340.html (9,497 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: Stew Perry Contest (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:09:28 -0500
On 31st December Tom wrote... of the man from Winthrop! I just about managed 5 NA stations from 2200 - 2300z and 3 more from 0400 - 0415z. All NA signals were way down. Did make it with JH4UYB at 215
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00372.html (8,283 bytes)

71. Topband: New England Conditions On 160 (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:16:16 -0500
Greetings All, We'll be (joyfully!) delivering our eldest-born back to Portland, Maine to-morrow, so that he might resume his scholastic studies there, after spending Christmas break home here with u
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00048.html (7,429 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: Need advice (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:44:18 -0500
On 6th January Juhan wrote... ** One thing that I've always found contradictory in such discussions is the fact that it seems to be "...tribal knowledge" amongst Beverage aficianados that the WORSE t
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00090.html (8,224 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: 160 meter Jamming and OTHR (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:45:50 -0500
On 20th January Mike wrote... admiral in the U.S. Navy, and has had some fairly high positions within the Bush 43 administration. It be interesting to see what his take is on this situation with the
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00334.html (8,181 bytes)

74. Topband: RSGB 160-Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:26:50 -0500
Wow...! The RSGB crew really put a drive on, & have already posted, on their website, the results of the 2nd 2006 RSGB 160-meter contest (it was only run this past November, too, I believe)... I'm ve
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00357.html (6,873 bytes)

75. Topband: 24th January 2007 Conditions (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:22:25 -0500
It sure did pay-off to have that extra glass of water before bedtime last night...! I awoke just after midnight local time (EST), & found that the band -- besides being quite full with a good variety
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00381.html (7,571 bytes)

76. Topband: Thursday 25th January 2007 Conditions (VE3-Land) (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:10:04 -0500
Good Day All, Well, another great night of operating here in southern Ontario yesterday & early this morning...! An unsolicited call from SV3RF (my 160 DXCC 98) to me just before bedtime reminded me
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00390.html (7,704 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: DX Window For Contest (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:13:57 -0500
On 25th January Phil wrote... don't care where it is, but we all need to know so that we can respect it. ** Good Morning Phil et al, The DX Window is specifically addressed in the on-line rules for t
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00409.html (8,345 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: MYSTERY NOISE GONE! (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:29:14 -0500
On 25th January Bill wrote... A short time later I discovered that the dusk-to-dawn mercury vapour light on the barn had gone dark. Whether the lamp, the ballast or the contacts on the sensor were th
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00410.html (8,919 bytes)

79. Topband: "JA" Divided By "VE3" = 100 (29th January) (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:41:27 -0500
Good Day All, Was I dreaming, or did I really & truly work JA7NI this morning at sunrise, with a booming honest-to-goodness 599 signal into southern Ontario...?! I thought he was in a U.S.A. "WA7", s
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00455.html (7,449 bytes)

80. Topband: Key Clicks: A SECOND Look (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:02:14 -0500
On 30th January, Roy & friends wrote... based on tests run by K1GQ and me, the same goes for the TS-950SDX. adjustment to adjust the rise time. ** I believe that a very critical & key piece that seem
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00482.html (13,420 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu