Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gswynar@durham.net: 213 ]

Total 213 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical heigh t (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:59:43 -0500
On 14th September Joe wrote... Joe, Stay AWAY from any of that stuff! Some years ago I was given a HUGE spool of copper-coated welding wire -- nice copper clad steel wire that'll last a lifetime, tho
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00045.html (8,023 bytes)

42. Topband: Better Use of RG-6 Coaxial Cable... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:17:35 -0500
On 14th September Tom said... I wish I had photocopied the piece for future reference, but in the column "The Doctor Is In" for the February 2005 issue of QST, the author specifically referenced usin
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00053.html (7,843 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: EXCITMENT (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:30:30 -0500
On Wednesday 20th September, Bob wrote... Bob, Per chance that wasn't VE3CUI with such a commanding signal, now, was it...?! I'm S-L-O-W-L-Y getting back on the band this season, pending the retireme
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00079.html (7,689 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 07:05:20 -0500
Gary et al, I essentially "...grew up" as a Ham reading & thoroughly enjoying poring over the late-great Lew McCoy's articles -- whether based upon cold, hard, calculated scientific facts, or not, hi
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00032.html (8,302 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Common Mode Noise: PERSONAL EXPERIENCE (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:01:55 -0500
On 5th October Bob wrote... for higher frequencies. filters would be worth the effort on the low bands in Hi Bob, For what it may be worth, let me pass on a bit of info to you that I stumbled upon he
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00053.html (8,721 bytes)

46. Topband: Ground Radials Yet Again (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:23:32 -0500
An interesting -- and very easy to overlook! -- reference in ON4UN's latest lowband bible in the matter of ground radials... Specifically, wire laid atop the ground may be considered to have a veloci
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00093.html (7,351 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Ground Radials Yet Again (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:56:27 -0500
On 14th October Tom wrote... ...I don't think there'd be any problem with radials longer than 1/4-wave at all, Tom... I guess the point that I got from ON4UN's reference was simply that if a 1/4-wave
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00096.html (8,612 bytes)

48. Topband: Antenna Progress---Update (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:51:33 -0400
Good Day All, A short while back, a number of folks asked for any & all progress reports on my "...shortened radial" experiments. Here 'tis... This past Friday I FINALLY retired the long-suffering mo
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00158.html (9,273 bytes)

49. Topband: Conditions (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:27:53 -0400
It sure was nice to be able to actually copy -- and to WORK! -- all those European stations last night for a change... Up until now, for the past week or more anyway, it seemed that only the fellows
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00177.html (7,785 bytes)

50. Topband: Yesterday's News...? (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:50:04 -0400
Man-oh-man, but it sure was a bit of a shocker to hear the XF4NL gang go practically begging for QSOs on 160 this morning! What a contrast to just a few short days ago... I happened upon them quite b
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00182.html (6,777 bytes)

51. Topband: Short Radials / Antenna Update (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:39:43 -0500
Good Day All, Results with the "...interim" 2-element 135-degree phased inverted "L" array here are DEFINITELY getting interesting...! I re-wired the rat's nest maze of wires that is the manual anten
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00185.html (8,891 bytes)

52. Topband: Short Radials, Antenna Update: PART "TROIS" (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:13:59 -0500
Good Day Everyone, ...And a very FB day it has been too for me here, indeed -- it pleases me to no end to announce that the 3rd & final inverted "L" of my tri-angular phased array is finally up and r
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00194.html (9,161 bytes)

53. Topband: Short Radials & New Antenna: SUBSCRIPT (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 07:10:18 -0500
Good Morning All, Last night was an absolute bust here as far as conditions to Europe were concerned...however, this morning told a different tale to the Pacific -- and my new 3-element triangular ph
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00000.html (7,125 bytes)

54. Topband: ARRL SS CONTEST (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:16:29 -0500
Good Day All, I think it might be a lot of fun giving the Ontario multiplier to Sweepstakes participants on 160-meters this weekend...it's actually been many years since I was personally active in th
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00014.html (7,106 bytes)

55. Topband: Short Radials, Antenna Update: FINALE (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:46:58 -0500
Good Day All, Well, in as much as I might hate to be self-congratulatory & all, I must say, that I'm just as pleased as punch with the new 3-element tri-angular phased array here... Unfortunately, I'
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00027.html (9,317 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: BC Station (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 06:24:44 -0500
On 5th November Don wrote... night. I'm hearing it up here in the Great White North, too (70 miles due north of Buffalo, NY, 50 miles east of Toronto)...it seems to promptly disappear at sunrise, too
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00034.html (7,560 bytes)

57. Topband: "The Dry Look" (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:36:20 -0500
Good Afternoon All, Last week, whilst fine-tuning the series mounted air-variable capacitor in one of my inverted "L's" outside, I noticed the tell-tale signs of moisture condensation inside the "Fol
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00066.html (7,985 bytes)

58. Topband: Antenna Testing (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:52:02 -0500
Good Day All, I wonder if there might be any Amateur(s) reading this who live within -- or perhaps, who may be as close as possible to -- an approximately 30-mile radius of my QTH...? I'd like to con
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00115.html (7,726 bytes)

59. Topband: 160-Report From The G.W.N. ("Great White North") (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:45:13 -0500
Good Day All, I suspected that maybe the newly-installed phased array here wasn't all that I had thought it to be, last night, when I casually chased "G" stations in the RSGB 160-meter contest...I en
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00117.html (7,751 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: 160 mtr low signal - CW Pitch (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:35:42 -0500
On 27th November Bob wrote... CW pitch of 270 Hz for very weak signal DX-ing. Please tell me what you think on this. I have an IC-775 es hit has pitch control so it can be changed. Bob, I'm hardly an
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00188.html (8,830 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu