Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gswynar@durham.net: 213 ]

Total 213 documents matching your query.

181. Topband: Ground Radials & Multi-Element Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:03:23 -0500
Good Day All, I've seen ground radial lay-out patterns beneath multi-element vertical arrays illustrated in ON4UN's book that have the ground systems all inter-connected, thus "commonizing" the radia
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00165.html (8,117 bytes)

182. Re: Topband: SS 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:03:37 -0500
"...If anyone wants to try it just post your [SS] line score (QSOs, mults and total score) on the 160 reflector...I will see that you get an appropriate certificate...Super idea Larry....and I will b
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00203.html (7,713 bytes)

183. Re: Topband: Electrical height of short shunt fed tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:44:43 -0500
Years & years ago a learned & wise old Ham radio sage & friend of mine once said that ANY tower--capped with a beam up top, or not--will ALWAYS be 50% taller ELECTRICALLY than it is PHYSICALLY. I've
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00287.html (7,883 bytes)

184. Re: Topband: 160M inverted L, 1/4 wave vs 3/8 wave? (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:25:45 -0500
"...I'd like some input on whether the 3/8 wave inverted L or 1/4 wave inverted L is likely to be a better low takeoff angle antenna." ** Ross, types... The one HUGE advantage that I especially like
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00306.html (7,695 bytes)

185. Re: Topband: A plea for antenna help from a fledgling 160m Op! (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:13:43 -0500
"...Whilst others claim as many radials as you can muster is the best way forward - regardless of antenna format..." ** Phil, I really & truly believe that we collectively do a great dis-service to n
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00325.html (8,877 bytes)

186. Re: [RFI] Topband: From CO8LY (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:08:01 -0500
"...Please help Eduardo if you can. He has been there in the contests when you needed him..." ** If anyone cares to mail me the components that Eduardo specifically needs, I'll be more than happy to,
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00339.html (7,660 bytes)

187. Re: Topband: automotive relays (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:29:49 -0500
Hi Guys, Re. automotive relays, my question to you all is simply this: why "buy", when a trip to ANY nearby automotive re-cycling depot (a.k.a. "...the junkyard") will yield all manner of relays from
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00351.html (7,835 bytes)

188. Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:47:54 -0500
Good Day All, If anyone is interested, I've scanned two pages plus a summary table from the 20th edition of "THE ARRL ANTENNA BOOK" re. "idealized" radial systems beneath a vertical antenna. Perhaps
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00352.html (7,524 bytes)

189. Topband: Attention W0UCE (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:49:28 -0500
I apologize for my taking-up Reflector space & time like this...so please, everyone just hit your DELETE button, unless of course you're W0UCE. Thanks! W0UCE, I've already attempted to send you two e
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00353.html (6,500 bytes)

190. Topband: Fw: Final Transistors for CO2LY (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:34:45 -0500
"...Has anyone confirmed being successful in obtaining two 2SC2290 Power Transistors for CO2LY?" ** Here is the status of Eduardo's transistors, to this point: -Thanks to the generosity of Stan (K5GO
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00355.html (7,535 bytes)

191. Topband: Idealized Radial Wire: FINALE (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:53:47 -0500
Rest assured, weary reader, that this will be my final posting on this subject...! A total of 40(!) requests for information were received here, and I complied with each & every one: however, lest th
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00361.html (7,496 bytes)

192. Topband: "The DX Summit" (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:16:24 -0500
Good Day All, I hope this subject isn't in breach of any Reflector guidelines, but let's face it: how many 160-meter DX'ers reading this can honestly say that they have never availed themselves of th
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00425.html (7,437 bytes)

193. Topband: Seasonal Nostalgia (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:24:32 -0500
Good Day Everyone, This being the Christmas season & all, I oft-times wax nostalgic about "...the good ol' daze" (who doesn't...?!). Anyway, with the latest running of the ARRL 160-meter contest now
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00243.html (8,326 bytes)

194. Re: Topband: RE66 in the SP test (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:14:18 -0500
"... I guess I must have sent my grid RE66 about a thousand times. I have been wondering why it seemed so difficult to get across, and I have found the same in previous years..." ** Hi Greg, Gee, but
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00322.html (8,771 bytes)

195. Re: Topband: FW: Quo Vadis the ARRL and your DXCC program? (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 08:33:52 -0500
"...Should I start to weep at a new technology coming ? Yes, I also feel to be cheated by using Web SDR system by others, but I am aware that nobody could do against anything..." ** One doesn't neces
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00026.html (8,758 bytes)

196. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Balanced line tuner 160-6m 300+ watts? (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:31:26 -0500
"...Does anyone have an old used Balanced line tuner (160m - 6m), that might be excess to their needs for a very reasonable price?? Or maybe a schematic and parts list to build one?" ** Howard, The 1
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00112.html (8,618 bytes)

197. Re: Topband: AM BCB noise in Portland, OR (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:44:32 -0500
"...Last night, I heard a very bad noise on the band." ** This is not directly related to what Tree's been experiencing, certainly, but I wonder if anyone else reading this may have encountered somet
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00209.html (8,751 bytes)

198. Re: Topband: Narrow Filtering (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:35:29 -0500
"...BTW, great conditions Friday night: lowest noise I've heard in a long time. Did anybody else experience lower than usual noise levels?" ** Hi George, I essentially parked my keester on one freque
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00049.html (9,263 bytes)

199. Topband: Interesting Observation (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:11:18 -0500
Hi Guys, I don't really know what the significance of this might be, as in all honesty I never really had any reason to do this before... In any event, here's the "interesting observation" alluded to
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00052.html (7,691 bytes)

200. Re: Topband: Interesting Observation (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:27:24 -0500
"...We see this effect in the Arctic every winter. It is not the leaves but the ground. Once I increased the radials to (A Lot) the vertical antenna stayed put at 1832 or so. I actually made this mea
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00062.html (8,289 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu