Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: How electrically tall is this tower please? (will it workon 160?) (long read) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:30:26 +0100
Mike This may not go out to the reflector (hove some problems with it !); but you will see it. I'm no expert on shunt feeding; but I would look in ON4UN's book, or even the ARRL handbook would help y
/archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00065.html (9,800 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FIRST EVER QSO JA (Zone 25) - VO1 Nov 23 2008 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:36:56 -0800
Well done on your fine achievement; I bet you felt good ! Question though - were you the first VO1 ? In the 1970's, I remember VO1KE (Mike ?!) used to be very active, and a good signal too, certainly
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00247.html (7,196 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: More 160M JA History (Viewed from the NA side) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:28:11 -0800
That's an interesting history Jeff; and I REALLY ought to buy your book (maybe a XMAS present!) I never meant to underrate Frank's achievement by the way , that was very good achievement, and he shou
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00266.html (7,926 bytes)

4. Topband: 6Y/G3NKC QSL's arrived from printers (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:55:15 -0800
To Those who have requested a direct QSL for any of my QSO's in October, rest assured that the cards arrived from the printers this week, and will be posted this weekend. Anyone else who needs a card
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00029.html (7,181 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Tuner ??? on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:13:00 -0800
The problem with most commercial tuners is that the spacing of the capacitor veins are too close. Especially on 160m, if your antenna is voltage fed ( i.e. approaching a half wave), then they will ar
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00146.html (8,092 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: CQ 160 weird ideas (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:39:31 -0800
Tree I think that your idea is a bad one, if you don't mind me saying so ! The flaw with splits like this is that you might hold your run freq, since there is no-one else there; but you will never ho
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00146.html (8,612 bytes)

7. Topband: GD ACTIVITY TONIGHT (score: 1)
Author: Dave Sharred <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:13:57 +0000 (GMT)
Morning all, After the contest, we will stay on for a while more, to look for JA. We know there is demand, but there is a lot of QRM in the contest. 73 de Dave, G3NKC ________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00251.html (6,874 bytes)

8. Topband: MD4K & QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:24:34 -0800
FB Steve; glad you got it OK; we posted it from the Airport as we left ! To be correct - Andy will deal with cards when you pay via PayPal; and you will get a better (!) card. I am listed as the mana
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00326.html (8,057 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: MD4K & QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:56:55 -0800
Hi Jorge If you search on QRZ.com for MD4K, it will say "GD0TEP for VHF"; "G3NKC for HF QSO's". Andy's main interest is VHF, but he has offered to get a card fast to anyone who needs one. He always c
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00328.html (7,501 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: QSB surfing (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:56:41 -0800
Herb, KV4FZ wrote : " So many times the DX (sometimes a new country or DX-Pedition) comes back to me as K4VFZ and no matter how many times I send my call I get back "K4VFZ R R 599 TU QRZ" I have trie
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00070.html (8,969 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: 80m vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:25:49 +0100
Hi Carl I don't know the vertical that you are referring to; but of course the first point is that the base should be isolated from ground. You may have this feature already. If the antenna is too sh
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00022.html (7,381 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: T antenna Resonance Dimensions and Z (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:26:14 -0800
them a little. A makeshift coil should not be such a problem. WE may need to raise that feed impedance a little; if they come out at 20 Ohms; may be higher depending on ground resistance. Thanks for
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00149.html (8,398 bytes)

13. Topband: Phased verticals question (again!!) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:42:57 -0800
Hello collective Knowledge! Next weekend is of course the CQ 160m Contest; we are planning a trip to our site at MD4K. We have an unfinished project; a pair of phased verticals using 26m Spiderpoles.
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00111.html (7,013 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Phased verticals question (again!!) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:42:01 -0800
Hi Thanks to all those that replied; and especially to John G3PQA, who I felt I had put on enough to mither him again ! Seems like it's not critical for a pair; though one station favours in line. An
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00114.html (7,239 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: QSL info? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 08:18:18 -0800
I am with C31CT at present; his English is not so good but I asked him. Simple answer is as stated; he does not like QSLling There is no help for this; Dave; you can only hope for another operation s
/archives//html/Topband/2011-02/msg00138.html (7,462 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: 7O6T LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sharred" <g3nkc@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:32:17 +0100
My 80m QSO was on 30 April, 160m on 5 May and 10m on 15 May. Both of the early QSOs are confirmed but the 10m (on the last day) is not. This could mean they are loading the logs in batches by date."
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00067.html (7,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu