Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:eckerpw@yahoo.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Half or Quarter Wave?? (score: 1)
Author: paul ecker <eckerpw@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:35:23 -0800 (PST)
New to the list and new to 160M. I have a 1/4 wave Inverted L that I have finally got the bugs out of and it seems to be working fine. Vertical leg is 45' and horizontal run is 86' for a total length
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00085.html (7,067 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Half or Quarter Wave?? (score: 1)
Author: paul ecker <eckerpw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 08:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Thanks to all who replied to this thread. It seems that the consensus is to leave well enough alone, although there were some good suggestions on how to improve the 1/4 wave setup. So thank you again
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00118.html (10,279 bytes)

3. Topband: Tuning 160M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: paul ecker <eckerpw@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
I put up a 160m dipole but now need to tune it. SWR at low end of band is abt 3 and at top end abt 5. From what I have read this means I need to shorten it. My question is how much should I take off?
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00375.html (7,206 bytes)

4. Topband: Tuning 160M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: paul ecker <eckerpw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Last week I posted:  I put up a 160m dipole but now need to tune it. SWR at low end of band is abt 3 and at top end abt 5. From what I have read this means I need to shorten it. My question is how mu
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00047.html (7,719 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu