Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:don@g3bj.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Beattie" <don@g3bj.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:06:46 -0500
But Roger, unless I have missed something, in regards to your PS, do not most of the rarer DXpeditions on 160 work split? I agree the volume of callers should keep the calling channel clear, but it's
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00002.html (17,900 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Beattie" <don@g3bj.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:26:02 -0500
Mike - I agree the objective, but the reality is a little harder! The 160 allocations across Europe, for example, vary widely. 1800-1810 is not generally part of the allocated spectrum. Various count
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00004.html (10,602 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Beattie" <don@g3bj.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:23:51 -0500
Don, The use of that spectrum by others has reduced very significantly. I cannot say that there are no other users, but it's not like it used to be when the current spectrum allocations were original
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00053.html (11,485 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1)
Author: Don Beattie <don@g3bj.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:07:38 +0000
That could be one reading, Don. The other is that WRC Agenda time is intensely sought after, for many changes to spectrum allocations. IARU was confronted with the prospect of failing on both its bid
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00085.html (10,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu