Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 125 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: 160 (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 19:42:20 -0500
I would agree a separate DXCC award should be established for operators using remote stations that exceed a certain distance from the control point...like a station half way around the world. To me t
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00096.html (16,478 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: 160 (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 14:22:54 -0500
Excellent post... Cecil K5DL _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00139.html (12,706 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160 - how you can make a difference (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 16:32:13 -0500
I worked very little DX on 6M until FT8 so there is still something more going on than you have discovered in your testing. Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad e. Be careful how you switch modes. FT8 likes
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00142.html (13,676 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: BOG height (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:28:57 -0500
Guy...a great post! Great information for those of us who are looking for RX antenna options but dont have the room for the normal RX antennas... And also a real breath of fresh air in light of our r
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00147.html (16,010 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: FYI Robot contacts "outlawed" by ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:14:22 -0500
I'd be curious to know how they plan to enforce that decision. Cecil K5DL _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00221.html (8,352 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: FYI Robot contacts"outlawed" by ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:06:29 -0500
If you expected FT8 to be disallowed in whole...that's not happening. Cecil K5DL _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00227.html (8,573 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Vacuum relay connections? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 18:20:55 -0500
Soldering to them is correct... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00048.html (7,004 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:50:04 -0500
I think the key word is Station which assumes that 500M diameter circle encompasses all aspects of the station to include feedlines and antennas. A transmitter and/or receiver are not a station witho
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00098.html (12,181 bytes)

109. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:27:43 -0500
Its not my intent to disparage anyone. Just an attempt to better define the intent of the rule as it relates to what a station is. Maybe if the feed point of those antennas are within the circle its
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00104.html (13,921 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: ssb contest stations hogging cw portion (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:49:12 -0700
Good day to be on a WARC band if close to being peed off. There are other thing to do for sure. Cecil K5DL _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflecto
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00182.html (8,055 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: VE6WZ at sunset in Ukraine (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:55:54 -0600
Doug, Just because you cant hear it doesnt mean its not there. Much of the weak signal stuff heard on todays high tech radios couldnt be heard 70-80 years ago. Technology has advanced. Try using a re
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00032.html (9,299 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: Problems with inv L on pier over salt water (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:01:20 -0600
Im far from an expert but if you were over salt water I would have placed the counterpoise in the water. Id be curious what others think. Great experience though... Cecil K5DL _________________ Searc
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00074.html (9,428 bytes)

113. Re: Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:02:10 -0600
Some international diplomacy? Save it! K5DL Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00115.html (12,090 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:50:49 -0600
Stealth derogatory expressionsthats a new approach. Cecil K5DL Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Humm, it should be fun... You can be in the contest and same time behind barbecue... Are remote stations a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00123.html (14,724 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:25:29 -0600
Dont let him discourage you Herb, I think an FT8 contest would be fun. We can discuss it further but wont do it here Cecil K5DL Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Herb, the stupid FT8 mode should be ignor
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00127.html (9,965 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:55:38 -0600
Thats all fine and good but thats clinging to the assumption that these are mindless younger hams that at some point will get bored with the digital stuff, drop out of the hobby and fade away. Actual
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00156.html (10,269 bytes)

117. Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 11:51:57 -0600
Well its is an all inclusive list for Topband activity...but as you can see its pretty selective. Over time hopefully most of the digital mode discussion will migrate to the new list and it will no l
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00162.html (17,100 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:31:42 -0600
Still taking pokes at the FT8 ops. What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8? Thats like telling CW guys that their achievements arent really noteworthy compared to how the Sideband guy
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00087.html (8,611 bytes)

119. Re: Topband: Fwd: [QRP-L] HU1DL German DXpedition in El Salvador by N6TVN (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:27:59 -0600
Congrats...great story! Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00094.html (10,089 bytes)

120. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:20:06 -0600
Tune the amp till the antenna ARKs and back off a little? Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00169.html (8,612 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu