Mail Archive Search: <+from:bill>

Results:

References: [ +from:bill: 2781 ]

Total 2781 documents matching your query.

261. Topband: PREAMP ARTICLE (score: 1): Author: magoo@isp.on.ca (BILL MCHUGH); Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:41:16 -0400; Would anyone having an issue of October 1989 Ham Radio be able to scan for me the parts layout for KD9SV's excellent 160M variable-gain preamp? My magazine has disappeared, though I have a copy of th; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00129.html (6,963 bytes)
262. Topband: re : CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:03:39 -0500; contest rules that penalties will be assessed for US participants Risk there is some LID decides to uses "K6SE" or "AA4NU" BELOW 1843 and works a few stations simplex just to DQ us or for torment...; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00139.html (8,304 bytes)
263. Topband: 160 Bandplan sooner or later (score: 1): Author: KG6DV@cs.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:23:29 +0100; A number of people seem to be saying they dont want to pay the price for being in the first group to support the 160 band plan. The concern seems to be that they dont believe it will work well at fir; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00147.html (8,267 bytes)
264. Topband: 160 bandplan "Teeth ... sooner or later" (score: 1): Author: KG6DV@cs.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 01:45:12 +0100; John K4IQ argues that without teeth the 160 bandplan, gentlemen's agreement version, wont work. This is part of the sooner or later reality John. Sooner or later there will be reglatory action to cre; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00151.html (8,099 bytes)
265. Topband: Fwd:From PI4COM (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:00:59 +0100; The attached message was received this morning from one of our friends at PI4COM. He asks that we listen DOWN during CQWW SSB below 1843 for his CQ calls. Ulli will be listening SPLIT above 1843 for; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00154.html (7,145 bytes)
266. Topband: FCC and ARRL 160 Bandplan (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:29:24 +0100; I think it would be a grave mistake to ignore the bandplan unless you enjoy corresponding with the FCC. For those who may not like the idea of mode segmentation on 160, you should get used to the ide; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00158.html (13,205 bytes)
267. Topband: Beverage orientations (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:32:45 +0100; I didn't think I'd have much use for a due North beverage either until I put up an un-terminated beverage North-South thinking more about CE0 and South America but when I started listening on it to E; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00159.html (7,241 bytes)
268. Topband: W3LPL 160M in CQWW Phone (score: 1): Author: dz@VOA.GOV (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 22:03:52 +0100; for list 2 stations to give them as many points as possible-- in every contest that a stateside QSO counts and on as many bands as possible. . . 73, es be a Gentleman on 160 -- es receive a few meage; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00166.html (8,179 bytes)
269. Topband: CQWW DX SSB and 160 Meter Band Plan (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 12:09:03 +0100; Earl, our committee did discuss whether to say anything about the DX window since the old ARRL bandplan suggested 1825-1830 as the window. After some discussion we decided not to specify a window bec; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00171.html (8,074 bytes)
270. Topband: V26B CQWW SSB 160M Operating Plan (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:27:28 +0100; hey Jeff i posted a note saying that at V26B i'll listen up also but it never got posted dont know why but there ya go gl in the contest cya from v26b Sam; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00173.html (6,649 bytes)
271. Topband: Riley is Wrong (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 16:41:10 +0100; are the best governed"? Anyone violating should not be considered a gentle(wo)man and ostrizied by their peers. I have to disagree with both of you on this. You are making the assumption that everyon; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00175.html (8,051 bytes)
272. Topband: Fwd: More from Ulli at PI4COM (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:45:23 +0100; 1) Ulli notes that the Dutch upper SSB limit is now 1870 2) Other Eu countries can go even higher 3) Frequencies below 1845 are really JAMMED in Europe making Dx'ing vy tough on SSB 4) He plans to f; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00182.html (8,714 bytes)
273. Topband: Seperation of Radial Ring vs Vertical (score: 1): Author: wpgerhold@longo-ind.com (Bill Gerhold); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:16:19 -0500; Knowing that the feed point of a 1/4 wave vertical is a high current and low voltage point, I have this question to pose. How close/far can one position the vertical (radiating element) in relation t; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00216.html (7,319 bytes)
274. Topband: Internet access via power lines reborn in Europe (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 11:16:49 +0100; Speaking of RFI, I hope our German subscribers will watch for reports of interference from this system. This is a potentially enormous market and impact on amateur RFI could be huge if there are prob; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00003.html (9,195 bytes)
275. Topband: Internet access via power lines reborn in Europe (score: 1): Author: k3ky@erols.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 11:53:51 +0100; The other day I saw something quite ironic at our local post office. There on the door, a bright red sign with white lettering was posted. It stated that cell phones are banned inside the post office; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00006.html (9,866 bytes)
276. Topband: HO1A again qrv on Topband (score: 1): Author: dj7aa-wil@t-online.de (dj7aa-wil by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:59:47 +0100; Hello all, again this year we will be on Contadora island for a 2 week stay. The trip startes at the 21th of September, last day will be the 8th of October. We will have 2 beverages running, one for; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00012.html (6,761 bytes)
277. Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:17:55 +0100; Greg, 1/4 wave slopers do work but they are very dependent on the individual installation. K0RF has used these for years very effectively and I assure you they work much better than low dipoles! I be; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00018.html (8,290 bytes)
278. Topband: Enhanced electron recombination (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 02:49:00 +0100; NM7M replied to W8JI: The path from the East Coast to JT is very similar to the path to UA9UCO I experienced from Colorado in 1987. His signal peaked at 210 degrees and was my first long path QSO fro; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00042.html (8,193 bytes)
279. Topband: RE: skewed paths (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 10:48:38 +0100; N0FP: http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/2000-November/001490.html IMHO this was conclusively proven by A61AJ (K1ZM op) and N7UA last November. Both were using 4-squares and the best path was SE fr; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00047.html (8,789 bytes)
280. Topband: Shortened and Low Dipole (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 07:43:02 -0400; While I agree that a vertical will do better than a dipole when working very weak DX due to it's low angle of radiation, a dipole will frequently outperform a vertical - at least at this QTH. I have; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00068.html (6,636 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]