Mail Archive Search: <+from:bill>

Results:

References: [ +from:bill: 2781 ]

Total 2781 documents matching your query.

181. Topband: Shortend Vertical model questions (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:40:00 -0600; Interesting thread ... (and I AM a supporter of modeling) Yet, isn't there a "watch out for" when using large differences of conductor diameters ? (like a 6" vertical and #14 top loading as to the r; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00052.html (8,730 bytes)
182. Topband: Dipole Height (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:48:22 -0500; For the first time in about 2 years, I measured the resonant frequency of my 160 meter dipole. I was surprised at the results but not completely. When I put the dipole up, I did not have an antenna a; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00104.html (6,830 bytes)
183. Topband: Re: Noise and reception (score: 1): Author: k3ky@erols.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:57:14 +0000; Hi, RickI need to dig my Sep 95 QST out of storage and reread the two articles about the K6STI horizontal loop- but I do remember the author saying that the antenna will work just about as well at 5; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00122.html (8,625 bytes)
184. Topband: Re: Signal on 1952.250 (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:30:21 +0000; K4KYV: Most radiolocation services are now at VHF/UHF. GPS is also expected to eventually replace radiolocation for new applications. In a March 1995 report on spectrum trends, NTIA said about radiol; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00131.html (7,719 bytes)
185. Topband: JT1CO Paths (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:21:08 +0000; My guess is that the next few weeks will offer the best chance for sunrise long path to Chak JT1CO. I looked back over my previous long path QSO's and found the following data. Common darkness refers; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00132.html (8,336 bytes)
186. Topband: JT1CO Paths (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:43:32 +0000; QSO Date UTC Com Dark QSO @ % Sunset path: JT1CO - W4ZV 22FEB02 2327 35 50 JT1CO - W4ZV 01MAR02 2326 0 nil Oops, too early and I goofed...change the above to: Sunset path: JT1CO - W4ZV 22FEB02 2327 3; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00134.html (7,005 bytes)
187. Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:10:38 +0000; Bingo! This is what K1ZM and I have been trying to say to those who think there is not a problem with USA stations continuously CQ-ing below 1843. It may take awhile for EU stations to adjust to list; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00145.html (9,505 bytes)
188. Topband: Conditions on 160m last night (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 23:47:56 +0000; Things must have really changed since I left Colorado in 1993 Milt. Back then there was no way I could have ever heard any DX from EU in the 160 SSB contest unless it was in the 30-35 window...which; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00154.html (8,755 bytes)
189. Topband: (the bandplan is working) Conditions on 160m lastnight (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:00:30 +0000; Here's a little data to support Ted's point: S53R 1810.0 YA5T qsx up for eu/ja...pse no ssb 2058 23 Feb 2002 OM5RW 1810.0 YA5T op 1.5 finnaly sri for qrm YA2124 23 Feb 2002 JA4DEN 1810.1 YA5T CQ JA C; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00161.html (9,442 bytes)
190. Topband: (the bandplan is working) Conditions on 160m lastnight (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:10:50 +0000; Tony, CQ's recommended DX window for BOTH the CW and SSB contests is 1830-35. If USA SSB stations honored the bandplan, 1800-1843 would effectively become the SSB DX window for any DX stations that c; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00168.html (8,202 bytes)
191. Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:24:11 -0500; Not so, and I'm a complaining digital op. Many times CW ops on 160 will either totally ignore users of other modes or, are completely ignorant of internationally recognized frequencies (by gentlemen'; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00178.html (8,558 bytes)
192. Topband: Re: 160 band plan (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:47:32 +0000; Barry and all, this is a repeat of a post made January 24 by Bob VE3KZ. 73, Bill W4ZV http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/topband/2002-January/014132.html Gentlemen Just a little view from North of; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00182.html (8,177 bytes)
193. Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:04:33 +0000; Right on Bill! I would add that RM-10352 is petitioning the FCC to restrict ONLY wideband modes to 1843 and above. Wideband modes are AM, SSB, SSTV and any technique that consumes bandwidth which inc; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00186.html (8,945 bytes)
194. Topband: RE: Digimodes (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 03:09:48 +0000; Hi Tom, Yes I agree with everything you have said. While I am not an avid Digital mode op, the few times I have tried it were really not rewarding on 160 meters. Lack of activity mostly I would imagi; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00192.html (6,897 bytes)
195. Topband: Confessions of A Known Criminal (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein KØHA); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:15:56 -0600; I expected the "police" to be out in force for the contest... I didn't call CQ below 1843. I didn't call people from the United States or Canada below 1843. I DID answer the DX stations that were li; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00193.html (8,499 bytes)
196. SV: Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:41:05 +0000; complaining of? Are they included in you 1Khz bandwith. If we should go for a bandplan it should include cw also. Ken, we should always be operating using properly adjusted equipment...CW and SSB. On; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00198.html (7,611 bytes)
197. Topband: Confessions of A Known Criminal (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:31:33 +0000; Perhaps a "Gentlemen's Band" and a band which allows contests are not compatible - except for the SP test, a contest is a contest - mostly rude and inconsiderate activity and there is nothing unique; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00202.html (7,050 bytes)
198. Topband: Re: Topband Digimodes (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:16:26 +0000; The IC-756pro has continuously variable filters from 3.6khz all the way down to 0 "zero" with the lowest usable 50hz. Works great on digimodes and CW. Sorry can't help with the 746. However, the new; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00213.html (6,529 bytes)
199. Topband: Re: 1843 (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:45:57 +0000; This was clarified in a reply comment to the FCC: Mr. Critchell is correct in his assessment. As members of the ARRL 160 Bandplan Committee, we discussed the problem of some amateurs not understandin; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00224.html (7,714 bytes)
200. Topband: CQ 160 DX Exchange Survey (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 17:45:02 +0000; If you haven't voted in this survey yet, please do so now since it will be closed sometime this weekend: http://www.contesting.com/survey/ Hopefully we can get a good sample of opinions for the CQ 16; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00010.html (6,481 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]