Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:art@nk8x.net: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: inv. L (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:27:59 -0400
Thanks everyone. I plan to try it this weekend. 73 Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00108.html (10,336 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: inv. L (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:16:08 -0400
I had a few hours free yesterday afternoon, so I began the dual 80/160 radiator inv. L project. In the process, I found that water had entered the coaxial center insulator that was used at the feedpo
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00116.html (9,022 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: inv. L (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:23:49 -0400
I did not use a switch. They are both permanently connected at the feedpoint. 73 Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00119.html (10,938 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: Where is everyone? (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:21:26 -0400
_________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00133.html (9,258 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: how to check a BOG (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:57:41 -0400
I took a hint from Luis HC1PF. A small 1.8+/- clock oscillator and a wire attached to a pole is what he used. I found said oscillator on eBay. It worked, but I am not sure the near field results shou
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00150.html (8,234 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: Plasma TV noise (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:17:27 -0500
This is a difficult problem. The neighbors might object to an anechoic chamber around their house. I'd guess the best solution would be to get a HWF up as high as possible, That isn't possible here a
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00119.html (10,396 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: New use for Noise Canceling box (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:08:52 -0500
A similar method has been in use here for a couple years. It let me snag VP8STI among others underneath a big noise last winter. This year, I made a wire flag for 80/160 as a noise pickup antenna, an
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00021.html (9,892 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: Improving condx? (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:55:29 -0500
Conditions to EU were better than I have seen so far this season I was only on from 0430-0500z, but even that was impressive. Tom 4O/KC0W was very loud. In fact, he was louder than he is at our sunse
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00132.html (8,190 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: Radio World; Noise Floor; Where do we go from here? (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:32:34 -0500
It is ironic to see AT&T's filings, since their uVerse product is responsible for quite an increase in the noise floor on HF. Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contes
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00189.html (7,887 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: Radio World; Noise Floor; Where do we go from here? (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:38:20 -0500
There are numerous reports on the web from hams experiencing RFI from and to Uverse. My main point is AT&T was complaining about receiving RFI, without keeping their own house clean. 73, Art NK8X ___
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00190.html (12,760 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: Radio World; Noise Floor; Where do we go from here? (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:18:09 -0500
Perhaps the 3801 isn't the only equipment being used. A quick search found this posting from three months ago. It references the AT&T 5268AC router. It appears to be made by Arris. This seems to be a
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00200.html (17,606 bytes)

92. Topband: More noise (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:26:58 -0500
I noticed the band noise was up a bit last night. I assumed it was due to the known sources in this area. i.e. neighbors houses, and trees touching AC distribution lines. This morning, I rewired the
/archives//html/Topband/2017-01/msg00092.html (6,699 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: Echo on 160m yesterday morning (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 09:38:32 -0500
I noticed a few weak echoes this morning around 0400. I thought it was someone playing around. Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-02/msg00013.html (8,282 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: Echo on 160m yesterday morning (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 14:13:56 -0500
I am wondering if there is a backscatter type condition that can also slow down the Vp. Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-02/msg00019.html (11,286 bytes)

95. Topband: survey (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 18:13:32 -0500
Out of boredom this afternoon, (not a big SSB fan) I created a poll to figure out if there are better and worse frequencies for DX-peditions on Top Band. The survey is at the top of my otherwise unre
/archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00004.html (6,552 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: survey (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:15:00 -0500
I received requests to extend the frequency range of the poll lower, to include fishing beacons etc. There is now a second poll that covers 1810-1819.5 http://nk8x.net/TB.htm 73, Art NK8X __________
/archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00005.html (6,654 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu