Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:andreas@n6nu.org: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:04:40 -0700
Both are true when you use a DXCLUSTER. Any spotting network will give you the whole call already. No need to decode it yourself, received over the internet, a non radio path. Even better, its spott
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00150.html (14,203 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FCC authorizes 1KW wireless power transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:49:26 -0800
Until it happens. Like Brexit or It think its the prudent thing to get ahead of this and understand it and be prepared to fight it if it causes problems. Its hard to put certain Genies back into the
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00092.html (8,106 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:57:10 -0700
Roger, Is your statement that you dont have enough opportunities to rag-chew on 160M? There is plenty of CW activity if/when there is a new DXCC entity to be had like VI9NI. Lots of OPs are calling w
/archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00120.html (9,714 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:59:41 -0700
Why stop there? Also remove SSB as it is way too easy. Nothing to learn. No skill required. Andreas, N6NU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflecto
/archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00144.html (9,101 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:23:31 -0700
You are missing the point. This was tongue in cheek comment. I could have picked any mode with any bogus argument. There are 10s and 100s of KHZ of spectrum wasting away unused and people have nothin
/archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00157.html (11,327 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: 160 meter QSL card checking (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:24:35 -0700
Why not publish the current rule regarding 160M field checking and remove the confusion: http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-field-checkin <http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-field-checkin> 1) Entities Eligible for Field
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00060.html (12,060 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: RG-179 Coax (score: 1)
Author: Andreas Junge <andreas@n6nu.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:55:24 -0800
Mike, Whats wrong with RG6? Or the DX Engineering version of it: https://www.dxengineering.com/search/department/cable-and-connectors/product-line/dx-engineering-f6-75-ohm-bulk-coaxial-cable?autoview
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00106.html (8,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu