Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W3HKK@roadrunner.com: 131 ]

Total 131 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Perils of qrp power readings (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:35:31 +0000
I compared numbers from my Daiwa CN720B to the Bird numbers and got: 20w my Po was 3% low. 10w my Po was 5% low 5w my Po was 28% low. Cant imagine how the below 5w numbers might compare. as the trend
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00049.html (69,829 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 227, Issue 16 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:05:03 +0000
Thought for sure you would tell us a lightning arrestor on a power pole a mile away had worn out and was in the permanent arcing position. A few years back a buddy and I tracked down my 59+20 noise t
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00070.html (30,716 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: Topband & the dreaded One Way skip (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:14:59 +0000
Yes. Many strong Euros were coming in last night! . And many couldnt hear me. A few heard me but only after 10+ calls did they pull out my callsign. Luckily HP3SS gave me a new one on TB on my first
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00088.html (9,734 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: How were CQWWDX-CW Test cndx on TB at YOUR QTH? (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:29:35 +0000
Id give it a 6.5. Europe was plentiful on FRI night, but with just fair sigs. SA-CA-Carib fair. I tried very hard to work a loud LU8 with no success! No Asia. No Pacific. No Africa. Thank you KL7RA!
/archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00092.html (11,692 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: 160m cndx during CQWW-CW in OH (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 14:27:19 +0000
Sounds scary Roger. Glad you came out of it reasonably well. ( I have 52 ft of 1.5"x 4' sections of mil surplus aluminum mast ( one by one LIFT- then INSERT the next at ground level) laid into a 40 f
/archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00001.html (9,976 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: No radials on my 52' tall 1/4 wave INV-L /ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 17:24:33 +0000
Saw the comments on adding radials, so I had to comment on my situation this year. I didnt get around to rolling out the 27 radials ( 30'-130' long depending on PL) yet, so I entered the ARRL 160 Con
/archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00012.html (22,378 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: ARRL160 - Andree (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:49:54 +0000
Europe was fair here in Ohio, Andree, with a few strong sigs. Most everyone I call I worked, but wasnt focusing on DX, since rate is King in that contest. And propagation was very good to excellent a
/archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00019.html (18,577 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: OTH Radar QRM in Ohio on 40m (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:26:59 +0000
40m can be pretty messy in the evenings with broad swatches of the phone band heavily disrupted by what i understand to be OTH radar from Cuba. that Cuba uses to block hf communications to and from C
/archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00047.html (18,697 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: RX antennas-SAL 30 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 20:53:30 +0000
Use a 6 yr old SAL30 and it outperforms my 2 el 40m phased array by quite a bit in its favored directions. Its my primary rx antenna for 160-80-40m. The SAL took me up to 178/164 on 160m and was a bi
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00027.html (18,252 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: SAL antenna and proximity to ground (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:40:55 +0000
Interesting commends by N4IV re: proximity of SAL to ground. Over the years Ive read several emails/comments on here by uses and the Array Solutions people regarding height above ground for the SAL30
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00045.html (26,562 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: K9YC's comments on radials (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 16:20:42 +0000
I can only echo Jim's comments about mechanical issues with very thin wire. I use aluminum fence wire #17 guage, and have to coil/uncoil my radials for the mowing season. This wire works fine but ten
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00054.html (7,180 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:38:38 +0000
Direct fed at the top, with the coax braid grounded to the tower. No radials needed. Ive used 1/4 wave slopers for 40, 80 and 160, with towers between 48 and 66 ft tall. On 40m dx performance was out
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00093.html (8,827 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: 4L2M - Mamuka what time do you hear the US best, on 160 ? (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:30:59 +0000
Will be looking for you. Good luck in the contest! Bob W3HKK [1] Links: -- [1] http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband%3Cbr _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.c
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00135.html (7,251 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: 160m activity night (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:41:10 +0000
Roger, G3YRO: Good to work you again. But Ive been caught with my pants down...err I mean with my radials up. Coiled up for summer mowing but now its too cold and snowy to lay them out. So Ive been w
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00136.html (11,317 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: CQWW160MDX-CW Contest summary for W3HKK (OH) (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:50:36 +0000
Fri night rates in Ohio were below average but open to EU. Sat night was slow with few signals as the night progressed, and 51 dupes. :< My 3830 summary: W3HKK: 18:45 hrs OTA 694 Q's ( plus another 5
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00160.html (10,604 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: V31XX antenna check. (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:57:47 +0000
Bill, thanks for the QSO and the mult! But its hard to say re: your new antenna. It should be a whopper for you, with 100 vertical ft, but overall signals wee down, and I didnt hear a lot from CA SA
/archives//html/Topband/2022-02/msg00002.html (30,865 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: K9YC and LU8DPM (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:03:02 +0000
Jim, I said the same thing in the ARRL 160 contest. I heard DPM loud and clear and called my head off...to no avail. And he wasnt coming back to anyone. Assumed his QRN/M problems must be monumental.
/archives//html/Topband/2022-02/msg00003.html (30,279 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: G3YRO storm (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:10:17 +0000
Roger, I think that storm you had has circled around and will be coming through Ohio later this week! :) Overall, I saw the 2022 contest rate here in the US was below normal for even the beginning of
/archives//html/Topband/2022-02/msg00004.html (30,033 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: Apologies....clutter (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 16:54:42 +0000
Hopefully this time is better. Bob ** _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2022-02/msg00021.html (6,552 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: VK on 160 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:27:53 +0000
Thanks for the tip Andy. Here in Ohio I notice quite often when EU is coming through on 160 after our SS and until your SR, the next morning I rarely if ever hear VK or the Pacific. To the contrary,
/archives//html/Topband/2022-02/msg00026.html (6,621 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu