Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W3HKK@roadrunner.com: 131 ]

Total 131 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: 160m (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:08:47 +0000
Thanks for encouraging more operation during (late) summer. I worked OK1CF and heard LY4A two nights ago, both with solid 559 sigs. I'll be listening on 160 CW. Bob Send Topband mailing list submissi
/archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00035.html (6,916 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Topband Interesting Cndx (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:17:47 +0000
Ron that was a mighty impressive haul you made. Ive set my alarm clock for 1030z to try for myself ! :) My 160 qtr wave INV-L ( apex 52') is in the summer ( lawn mowing) configuration. ie all radials
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00011.html (7,424 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: VK6LR Kevin sigs 559-569 from 1111z-1145z this morning on 1821.4 (cw) (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 12:10:20 +0000
worked Kevin on first call, simplex. He was in there pretty well from 1111-1145z, although qsb at times took him into the noise, here in central Ohio. Our Twilight-SR times today were 7:03 local- 7:3
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00014.html (8,386 bytes)

4. Topband: Ooops! my typo. Make that VK6LW on 1821.4 at 1111z (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 12:27:06 +0000
(typo) VK6LW Kevin came in this morning from 1111-1145z a very solid 559 peaking 569 here in central Ohio. Worked him on first call. Looked like he was getting takers at a slow but fairly steady rate
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00015.html (7,286 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: VK6LW - Kevin sigs 559-569 from 1111z-1145z this morning on 1821.4 (cw) (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 13:11:29 +0000
Hello Joe. Forgive my typo. It was VK6LW. I heard you work Kevin! You had good sigs up here. And congrats for working nearly half way around the world with your 100w. Thats over 100 miles per watt! :
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00017.html (11,027 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: VK6LW on 1821.4 this morning (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 16:36:00 +0000
Welcome K1WHS. DX seems to come in along the SE coast better than out here in Ohio, despite the QRN. But VK6LW was solid this morning for about 30 -35 mins this morn. In the past Ive noticed spurts o
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00019.html (12,265 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: TopBand DX (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:40:39 +0000
Enjoy reading the posts on TB DX! Pleaase keep 'em coming. I learn tidbits from them as well as picking up on when cndx are especially good. Sep-Oct has proven to be quite good. especially to VK( at
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00106.html (14,843 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 214, Issue 17 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:03:07 +0000
I have an AA54. It provides TDR graphing of your coax and can identify damage areas by distance and Z. With a multimeter, short the far end and measure d c resistance. and compare to the specs. Not a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00113.html (11,384 bytes)

9. Topband: VK6GX - 160 propagation (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:30:03 +0000
Phil, your neighbor VK6LW Kevin was my first VK6 on top band a few weeks ago. Solid 559 both ways here into central Ohio. What a thrill. I heard you on later...imagine that: TWO VK6's at one time! ..
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00129.html (7,046 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 215, Issue 1 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:43:00 +0000
Good question Gene. Id "think" leaving the two together inside the pvc jacket would help protect them from wx and mechanical damage for a much longer time. The downside is it would be much more visib
/archives//html/Topband/2020-11/msg00002.html (7,620 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Wed Activity Night.... (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 19:31:10 +0000
The past couple of nights have been fair. Hrd an LZ1 quite well but he didnt copy me enough to get my complete call sign ( 700w to INV-L at 52 ft + 26 coiled radials here). Then Sun night worked a fl
/archives//html/Topband/2020-11/msg00006.html (8,648 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: CW Activity Night (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:52:41 +0000
Cndx have been ok but with sometimes deep qsb that all but makes a station that was strong at first all but disappear. QSOs in the W3HKK log include: OM2XW - OK1CF - F5IN - DG1CMZ - SM5EDX - DL8LAS t
/archives//html/Topband/2020-11/msg00108.html (7,817 bytes)

13. Topband: 7Q7RU heard and worked last night hr in central Ohio (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:17:06 +0000
Saw spots but didnt hear a peep UNTIL 0120z last night through l about 0235 ( his sunrise) when he dropped out. Saw mni spots earlier from East Coast and ulf Coast stations but never hears the &q& un
/archives//html/Topband/2020-11/msg00137.html (7,156 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: 3830 submissions for the ARRL 160 test (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:40:58 +0000
So far, 788 logs have been submitted for the 2020 ARRL 160 Contest which strikes me as a big number. Terrific domestic conditions provided a lot of entertainment here in central Ohio.. I can only ima
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00081.html (6,947 bytes)

15. Topband: 160 L and radials (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:49:07 +0000
Interesting thread. Bought three acres in the country here in central Ohio, where the general ground conductivity articles feel we have good midwestern loam soil. Well, MY soil is more like semi clay
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00124.html (9,651 bytes)

16. Topband: Topband antennas - mine (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:00:18 +0000
My 160m antenna history: 1. (1980-1995) from central Ohio loading a 130 ft long qtr wave sloper off a 60 ft tower: Never loaded well, but worked KP4 and a couple others. No Euros or significant DX. (
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00191.html (10,501 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 217, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 20:01:16 +0000
anyone with experience using a 300' BOG? Suggestions based on your experience? ie are they worth it? I tried one before but without a preamp and found it worthless. ( almost no signals heard) suggest
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00051.html (52,977 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Henk - groundwater (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 20:09:26 +0000
Henk, thats a fine question and one Id be interested in hearing more on. Gotta think your question as it applied to PA-land is a lot different than the usual US guy's, with you being mostly close to
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00052.html (52,841 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: 300 ft BOG (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:36:34 +0000
Tnx to all who replied. Im attempting to revive the JK Bev-Flex antenna, I tested a few years ago. But am dealing with a bum wrist and shoulder, so am researching it in the meantime. Hopefully in a f
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00073.html (86,386 bytes)

20. Topband: 160m S meter readings - on my IC7610 (score: 1)
Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:14:28 +0000
My 160m INV-L gives me S5 noise most of the time. Which is why I use my SAL-30 for rx ( on 160-80-40m). The SAL lets my S meter rest on S0 on 160-80-40m, and lets me listen at 45 degree increments. w
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00192.html (7,268 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu