Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W2RU@frontiernet.net: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Key-clicks (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:31:57 +0000
Another key-click "friendly" rig is the Kenwood TS-950SDX. It includes the CW waveform rise/fall time adjustment as a menu item (#22), settable to 2, 4, 6, or 8 milliseconds. I run mine at 6 mS, afte
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00240.html (8,378 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FT5XO and 5Z4DZ last night (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:59:49 +0000
Here in upstate NY I've not found my sunset peak to be of much use during many nights of listening to the FT5. In Maine Paul may not have seen a significant peak just before their sunrise two nights
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00231.html (8,341 bytes)

3. Topband: Paths between FT5X and North America (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:33:41 +0000
A response to my FT5XO posting from Al, K7CA, has led me to one of the most fascinating examples of DX propagation from North America that I have ever played with. I know the propagation gurus know a
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00239.html (12,983 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Paths between FT5X and North America (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:54:33 +0000
Oh, I definitely think so. After all, near the antipode, long and short paths are nearly the same length, so the added mileage tranversed by a "long path" ray imparts very little added penalty. Of fa
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00246.html (9,257 bytes)

5. Topband: Antipode hint (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:50:58 +0000
One thing I perhaps didn't emphasize enough in my posting yesterday: When you are at or near the antipode of the DX station you are chasing, there is no one heading from you to him. There is NO short
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00265.html (6,669 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Cone of Silence (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:17:26 +0000
Boy, my Beverages must be perfect COS length, then, because ZL and VK signals are virtually unreadable here at any time....:-) Don, you must be superman! By the time I could get from the chair to my
/archives//html/Topband/2005-05/msg00016.html (7,031 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: 160m vs DSL modem (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:45:57 +0000
To the best of my knowledge, 160 is the only band that caused problems with mt DSL modem -- but only when running my amp. It was very helpful here. But connecting your DSL modem to the phone line in
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00202.html (9,998 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Take-Off Angle Question (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:53:54 +0000
Here in upstate NY I have two very short Beverages -- one "sorta" NE (300 feet) and one "sorta" NW (200 feet). Usually they give me only a few dB of differential gain or rejection. But last night was
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00254.html (8,628 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Psychoacoustics (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:27:04 +0000
I agree with Tree. For MF/HF/VHF terrestrial weak signal CW reception I have found over the decades that I seem to do best with a hardware filter bandwidth no narrower than 1000 to 1200 Hz. Super nar
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00304.html (8,520 bytes)

10. Topband: ARRL 160 Conditions (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 04:50:02 +0000
Most unexpected QSO for me so far in the ARRL 160: Earlier this evening, at 2340Z, K6NR in Orange section answered my CQ. He had a good signal, too -- solid 569 copy here in upstate NY on my shunt-fe
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00018.html (6,850 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Error in ARRL 160 contest rules? (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:53:23 +0000
** Aha!!! The ARRL 160 contest is not -- and never was -- intended to be a DX contest. It's a domestic contest. In fact, in its first running in 1970 and for some number of contests thereafter, _all_
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00063.html (10,739 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Carrier on 1820.4 (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 04:17:03 +0000
I only have two short Beverages, aimed NE and NW, plus my shunt-fed tower. I'm in FN23nr, about 50 miles NNE of Utica, NY, in the middle of nowhere. Here's what I observe: On my vertical at 0350Z, th
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00094.html (8,883 bytes)

13. Topband: More Re: Carrier on 1820.4 (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 04:32:54 +0000
A follow-up to my earlier posting: I am now (0420Z) seeing (fluttering bars on the receiver S-meter) and hearing rapid flutter on the carrier on my vertical, with deep fades down to S3 or S4 for a fe
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00095.html (8,175 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Split frequency working (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:22:46 +0000
During my one and only experience as "rare DX" (operating KH6GPQ in the second weekend of the 1975 ARRL CW DX Test), K1GQ taught me that technique for improving my lowband pileup management and QSO r
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00159.html (8,219 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: ZD8 on 160? (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:25:10 +0000
I heard ZD8QD on 1.828 MHz at 0030Z - 0040Z on 23 February 2006. He was having a lot of trouble pulling my call out of his local noise. (Or maybe it was my weak signal.) I can't recall if he worked a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00199.html (7,264 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: LBOW & WAS (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:24:30 +0000
Perhaps they'd rather spend their time actually operating 160M than trying to figure out how to get an LotW certificate, etc. Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00216.html (6,955 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: 160m Contest (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:37:22 +0000
The only similarity I could find between UA9CLB's setup and mine was in Photo #7.... Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00029.html (7,011 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Stew Perry TBDC changes being considered (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:46:57 +0000
My sentiments exactly! Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00169.html (8,917 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Best Height Above Ground for a Beverage RX Antenna (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:07:03 +0000
And how much has your liability insurance premium gone up? Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00190.html (8,019 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Key Clicks (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:41:04 +0000
And based on tests run by K1GQ and me, the same goes for the TS-950SDX. 8 msec is clickless, 6 msec is pushing it. 4 ms and 2 ms create totally unacceptable bandwidth when others are weak-signal DXin
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00436.html (7,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu