Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com: 311 ]

Total 311 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: The End of Another One... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:46:28 -0600
Hi, Eddy - yup, might switch the 160 meter loading coil into my vertical system on and off for another week or so but then guess I'll just leave the switch in the 80 meter and above position for the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00093.html (9,067 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: TB season (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:00:11 -0600
Sigh -- guess I stand admonished for even THINKING about leaving Top Band off my list of "bands to check every so often during the Spring, Summer and early Fall months." Will there be SOME communicat
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00105.html (10,832 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: TB season (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:09:33 -0600
I'm in if we're not traveling around soemwere...hi hi _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00122.html (10,668 bytes)

64. Topband: Well, where is everybody??? (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 07:30:10 -0600
So, lots of chat here 'bout not giving up on Top Band in the spring and summer months - e.g., kick off an addiiton Stew Perry event or two, keep looking for stations 'cuz there'll be others on, yadda
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00138.html (8,503 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:54:20 -0600
You can count me in as a QRP entry, Sam - yep, LUV the Stew...we QRPers are worth more 'bout that time than others. Hi Hi Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ..
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00147.html (10,471 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:06:04 -0600
Oh yeah...not that comment SURE must lead one to believe that dooood is 'trollin'! Hah - what an absurd thought - disallow QRP operations in an event where a QRP station garners more points/weight th
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00149.html (11,287 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:56:06 -0600
Meant to type...Oh yeah...NOW that comment sure musst lead one to believe that dooood is trollin'! Oh yeah...not that comment SURE must lead one to believe that dooood is 'trollin'! Hah - what an abs
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00152.html (11,635 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: TB season (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:57:29 -0600
"REAL QRP," Cecil - I just completed QRP WAS on Top Band! Love the excitement of workin' someone on 160 with QRP power! Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ...
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00153.html (11,745 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:01:13 -0600
I understand your use of "dissallow" Jim -- this will be my first summer of operating Top Band, albeit at QRP levels ...I can crank it up to 20 watts max...after being shamed into operating after mak
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00154.html (12,159 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:44:30 -0600
JT65 certainly levels the playing field as far as us low power goof balls are concerned - I, personally, dislike the digital modes, for now....when I can't "work' with CW any longer I might cave in a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00156.html (11,476 bytes)

71. Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:03:27 -0600
Dang....can we GET away from an over-indulgence/concern over what's "said" or "typed"? "72" is a form of radio shorthand that roughly translates as meaning "Best wishes QRP!" Been that way for a looo
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00158.html (11,803 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:25:09 -0600
Yes, in retrospect, I'll assume that was a tongue in cheek 'view' of 72...,Hah, the laugh is on me! 71.5, Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB -
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00166.html (17,247 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: It is not so much propagation (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:47:24 -0600
THAT's my point, Dave! Don't need to have looooooong winded QSOs but just calling CQ and meeting up with others to find out what antenna system they employ? That would make my day! Hope to hear you a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00176.html (10,774 bytes)

74. Re: Topband: It is not so much propagation (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:24:53 -0600
Ah, we're back to that old saw -- don't muck with 'dem DX chasers!!! OK, I've learned my lesson -- ZIP....mouth is shut, figuratively speakkng! Sheesh! _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00193.html (14,478 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: It is not so much propagation (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:25:49 -0600
Oh, I "got that one," right away, Jim! Smiling... _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00194.html (13,658 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: It is not so much propagation (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:51:20 -0600
I don't think that's what Jim F. is/was alluding to.... _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00203.html (15,629 bytes)

77. Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:05:28 -0600
Somebody mentioned getting on Top Band to see how his new Wellbrook loop was working - wonder if that person is lurking about and can comment on how it performed. That antenna sure seems to be gettin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00000.html (6,061 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: E51M 160 and 6M (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 06:06:10 -0600
Well, I didn't hear them on 160 this A.M. out here in s/w Utah but I did hear and work 'em QRP on 80 meters this morning so....something good to "report" from the black hole of low band communication
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00044.html (7,871 bytes)

79. Topband: Need some "help" finishing QRP WAS on 80 meters (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:53:06 -0600
To all that worked me and QSL'd so I could complete QRP WAS on Top Band, your assistance is much appreciated. I need three states on 80 meters to complete QRP WAS on 80 - RI, MA and VT. You don't hav
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00121.html (7,184 bytes)

80. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:36:18 -0600
Good for you, Dan - I could barely hear him out here in s/w Utah this morning but I was super excited to hear 'em with my little 40', top loaded vertical! With only 20 watts maximum output and all of
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00138.html (8,490 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu