Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VS\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+speech\s+proc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VS\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+speech\s+proc\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. VS: [TenTec] Omni VI speech proc. (score: 1): Author: "elstar-mt" <elstar@elstar.fi>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 07:15:27 +0200; Never listen to locals , that means that DX likes processor at 2pm , at least that was good on my heil 4. Mark OH3LX. --Alkuperäinen viesti-- Lähettäjä: tentec-bounces@contesting.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00135.html (9,287 bytes)
2. VS: [TenTec] Omni VI speech proc. (score: 1): Author: "elstar-mt" <elstar@elstar.fi>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 06:29:57 +0200; Old local OM says "do not use it" All de men says about "It's very good and lifts up signal few S-units" On my tests it works pretty nice on all high Quality mics. Mark OH3LX. --Alkuperainen viesti--; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00172.html (10,106 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]