Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TT\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+QRQ\s+Performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TT\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+QRQ\s+Performance\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TT RE: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:44:50 -0400; Just as I thought I was beginning to understand this thread, I've been thrown back into a quandary. What is the flaw in my understanding here: 1. The Orion can't send CW over 42 wpm. The Orion can s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00898.html (8,625 bytes)
2. Re: TT Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:48:59 -0400; is then the Bob...this is not fair, but I'll ask it anyway. If I unplug the DGM keyboard and/or the YPlog from the Orion, and move the connector to the Omni 6, and the Omni 6 produces a correct repr; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00916.html (11,179 bytes)
3. Re: TT RE: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:56:10 -0400; Al, Heck no, don't worry about that. Sometimes my finger tips dont accurately convey what my brain cell is thinking. So would be certainly glad to own up to any mistakes I make here. Tom - W4BQF Okay; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00917.html (9,447 bytes)
4. Re: TT Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:16:29 -0000; keyboard up fault same Tom What you are describing here does not reflect my experience, having conducted my own tests on Orion at 60 wpm. Both of my Orions perform in the same way. Both are at 1.371,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00919.html (10,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]