Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+wide\s+posts\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: Byron J Watts <bjw@byron.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:06:12 -0600
what about those of us who use larger screens (heck some read 3 screens at a time) or higher resolutions, and would much rather see it all used up in text rather than 2/3rds wasted? I've always had a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00749.html (6,847 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: Ynkedragon@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:15:50 EST
<< I'm curious what the average screen resolution for the average semi-computer literate ham is. For goodness sake don't develop webpages for 640x480 though, there's just no space for anything. >> Ju
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00750.html (7,273 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:19:47 -0500
I use 1024 x 768 on my several computers. Have not had anything less than that for perhaps 5 years. Not trying to bash anyone....just providing the requested information for interest. 73 de Gary, AA2
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00751.html (8,267 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:13:53 -0000
Do you really need that resolution? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00754.html (9,648 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Wagner" <tfwagner@snet.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:36:50 -0500
These are the stats for the N1MM.com website for the past 2 1/2 years. This represents 81,000 hits. About 72% are 1024 x 768 or better... Screen Share 1024x768 53.14% 800x600 24.70% 1280x1024 12.14%
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00755.html (10,512 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:56:39 -0500
You must sit very close to the monitor! Ron wb1hga CW, an esoteric experience I use 1024 x 768 on my several computers. Have not had anything less than that for perhaps 5 years. _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00756.html (7,461 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:56:52 -0500
Yes, I do. But of course, I use all my computers for my engineering work in my business. Ham radio is just an adjunct. For ham radio, 800 x 640 would suffice.....however..... that said..... I prefer
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00757.html (11,097 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Choate" <aa0yy@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:35:14 -0600
first sorry to Steve for posting only to him. I am so blind that my resolution needs to be no greater than 600 X 800 or I struggle to read it with my walmart reading glasses. Mark ___________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00759.html (9,048 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Choate" <aa0yy@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:31:27 -0600
I am so blind that I cant see anything much smaller than 600X800 Mark _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00760.html (8,648 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] wide posts? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:35:12 -0500
Well...no, I don't sit real close. But then again, its a 23 inch viewable area flat screen LCD monitor. So its big enough for even an O.F. like me to see ! :) The LCD screen is nice too, because it i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00780.html (9,257 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu