Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+used\s+gear\s+proces\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+used\s+gear\s+proces\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Dan Presley <n7cqr@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:04:04 -0800; I am trying to help a friend to evaluate and possibly sell a nice Corsair II with all of the filters plus the 263 outboard VFO, and a Paragon II with cw and AM filters .Both have matching PS/speakers; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00051.html (6,687 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Bill Cotter <n4lg@qx.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:13:44 -0500; I bought a nice Corsair-II (late model with factory amp in/out) and PS at the Cave City hamfest last year for $325. Included three filters (2.4, 1.8. .5). All it needed was some contact cleaner on th; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00057.html (8,326 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:43:30 +0000; The Corsair II alone is worth $250-$350 depending on condition. Add $150 for the VFO and $50 for each filter for a total of $550-$650. This assumes everything works. 73, Barry N1EU __________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00063.html (8,487 bytes)
4. [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:12:16 -0500; I paid over $600 for my Paragon II back in 2012. The Paragon II is much more reliable than the earlier Paragons. The VCO board problems were fixed, and the back up battery problems were eliminated wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00066.html (7,267 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: steve jobes <w1dxh@aol.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:56:58 -0500 (EST); I second that, I don't think I would ever part with my Paragon II. I use my Orion 99% of the time, but on many occasions I will switch on the Paragon II if I am just in a listening mood. It has been; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00067.html (8,478 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:21:52 -0600; I wish I'd not let my Paragon II get away. Oh well, that's water under the bridge, as they say. 73 Bob, K4TAX I paid over $600 for my Paragon II back in 2012. The Paragon II is much more reliable tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00069.html (9,058 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:40:55 -0500; I kick myself daily for getting rid of my KWS-1, my Ranger 1, my Icom IC-728, my Yaesu FT-102 ......Such is life!!! ....Dave 73 Bob, K4TAX I paid over $600 for my Paragon II back in 2012. The Paragon; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00070.html (9,474 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:06:55 +0100; Dave, I understand you missing the FT-102. That was a fine radio. Would love to have one today. And the KWS-1 and Ranger are nice for old time sake, but why the IC-728? 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfur; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00071.html (10,813 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:10:07 -0500; Very much like the Kenwood TS-130S...... Simple, no extra junk...no menus, analog S meter, and works great! And, it was a very nice looking rig...IMHO. ....Dave On 1/11/2014 4:06 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / N; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00072.html (10,854 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:21:34 +0100; OK, but the 728's receiver was pretty worthless here in Europe, especially on 40m. With the criteria you spoke of, I'd much prefer the FT-900AT. No software menus, simple to operate and the radio had; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00073.html (12,510 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:47:13 -0500; The FT 890 and 900 are very nice also....but they are in another class of radio, that I can find anywhere today. A radio that just works great, with no frills is no longer available....unobtanium the; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00075.html (13,176 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] used gear proces (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:26:35 -0500; One idea ... I kinda thought the Eagle was just that sort of simple, uncomplicated, and straightforward type radio . . . it just costs a bit more for the newer, better receiver performance, etc., and; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00079.html (9,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]