Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+stupid\s+OMNI\s+tricks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+stupid\s+OMNI\s+tricks\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] stupid OMNI tricks (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 08:46:37 -0800 (PST); This is a fun discussion. Just a few more comments. 1. Who cares if the RF gain interacts with the SWR reading? (Well, as long as minimum is still roughly minimum.....for those who actually USE the S; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00609.html (8,346 bytes)
2. [TenTec] stupid OMNI tricks (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 10:51:52 -0600; Proper SWR meters don't change their indication with position along a mismatched line. Many ham/cb metere DO change their indication so they aren't showing SWR but something like impedance. 73, Jerry; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00611.html (7,068 bytes)
3. [TenTec] stupid OMNI tricks (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:13:22 -0500; Me. I think it's both weird and cool plus a good use of the reflector bandwidth to compare rigs. Send it to me. I'll put it on Ebay. Maybe that's the reason for the RF Gain adjustment so you can com; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00612.html (8,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]