Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+speech\s+processing\s+idea\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+speech\s+processing\s+idea\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Byron J. Watts" <bjw@byron.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:52:37 -0500; Ok first let me state that I've got a Tentec Omni D, so this is somewhat related to this list. I have a VST host program on this computer that allows me to use a "hard" limiter on microphone audio in; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00631.html (7,196 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:27:11 -0600; Unfortunately the audio envelope isn't the RF envelope and severely clipped audio results in peakier RF than unprocessed audio. Gives it a splatter characteristic, so saith the book on SSB by Collins; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00632.html (8,120 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Byron J. Watts" <bjw@byron.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:02:28 -0500; ahhhh :) see i knew i was missing something or else someone else would already be doing it. I'm still tempted to look at the rf envelope on a scope just to see for myself (into a dummy load of course; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00634.html (9,153 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:27:37 -0600; Oh yah, its been tried back about 1958. -- 73, Jerry, K0CQ, All content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00635.html (7,835 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:30:08 -0400; They had pc's in 1958 ? Interesting. I was still using mainframes and terminals in 72....shows how much I missed. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00637.html (8,798 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:32:12 -0600; Not really PCs. Tended to take up a whole room or building, and tended to have lots of noise from the card readers. I don't know of any analogue inputs in real time. But speech clippers were tried an; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00645.html (9,570 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: Martin AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:41:23 -0400; Hey, the "solution" to equalize peak-to-average is to use CW, PSK31, RTTY, or if you must, digital voice! I suppose you could also use NBFM if you want to keep your linear busy. Seriously, the Orion; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00647.html (10,505 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:58:26 -0600; CW works for me and I work far weaker paths on CW than on SSB whether HF or microwave. But the discussion was SSB. -- 73, Jerry, K0CQ, All content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00648.html (9,133 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] speech processing idea (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:48:48 -0400; I operate PSK 31 and RTTY almost exclusively. Just a tiny bit of SSB, no CW any more. But I'd like to try digital voice. Is anyone using it ? Comments ? Hardware ? How's it work with Ten Tec radios ?; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00659.html (11,889 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]