- 1. [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:42:25 -0000
- tHE PESON WHO SAID ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS CHANGE THE SOFTWARE..hE FORGOT TO MENTION THAT IT COULD TAKE QUITE A WHILE TO ACCOMPLISH THAT, _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00536.html (6,550 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:14:01 -0600
- I find that all of these issues about software are quite comical.........except to the folks that write the code and those that de-bug the code and those under pressure to get it released. I found on
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00539.html (8,144 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed_ww3a@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:32:26 -0500
- We're hams...that ship has already sailed! -- Reed O. Krenn reed_ww3a@alltel.net "You will be reincarnated as a toad -and you will be much happier" _______________________________________________ Ten
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00540.html (6,892 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:00:31 -0500
- I do SW for a living. Bugs are a way of life. They happen and cannot be eliminated. You can follow good process do testing at different levels, etc., but still they are there. In my world I find the
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00542.html (9,660 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:21:29 -0600
- Yes and in that small bundle of code, the combinations extrapolated to the Nth +1 magnitude only nets 1.6384 times e10th power. Thus more than one or two likelihoods of......oops. In a different pers
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00543.html (8,221 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:05:26 -0500
- Yes, bugs can be lurking in complex software. When I was in the real time software business, our idealistic goal was to have the system fail gracefully - or at a minimum, allow a dump of critical inf
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00545.html (7,742 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:24:21 -0500
- The main problem in software engineering is figuring out what is this program supposed to do, and how do we verify it? The Orion (only to pick one example) has an extremely complicated interface to t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00546.html (9,003 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Dunbar" <jdunbar28@mchsi.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:45:40 -0600
- Steve, I work with some very complex software developed applications for the Department of Defense, and some of the same principles apply here with the TEN TEC software development and testing. Mainl
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00613.html (9,013 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:37:34 -0500
- Yes, but ... Getting people to actually follow the process is the trick. It is so tempting to cut corners and ship it as soon as the new function is proven to be working. It takes a lot of fortitude
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00614.html (10,123 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] sdr'S (score: 1)
- Author: "Graham Wright" <graham-g4fuj@talk21.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:16:52 -0000
- Shades of Microsoft here methinks! 73 Graham G4FUJ trick. function a scenario building where the with newly there that were Beta operational tested, FORGOT ___________________________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00656.html (11,548 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu