Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+receivers\:\s+paragon\s+vs\.\s+corsair\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+receivers\:\s+paragon\s+vs\.\s+corsair\s+II\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] receivers: paragon vs. corsair II (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:18:20 -0500; What are the opinions of the list on these two receivers? Any thoughts greatly appreciated! Thanks and 73 Mike W2IY _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesti; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00341.html (7,190 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] receivers: paragon vs. corsair II (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:58:32 -0600; Mike, On a quiet band you can't ear ball the difference on receive or at least I couldn't when I had a Paragon for operating on MARS frequencies. On a number of occasions I ran both the Paragon and t; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00352.html (9,279 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] receivers: paragon vs. corsair II (score: 1): Author: James Boswell <ka5siw@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:06:32 -0800 (PST); Mike, I own both of these rigs. Both radios have the same filters, use the same speaker, and use the same antenna. At any time you will find them set-up on my station, able to switch between; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00364.html (8,618 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] receivers: paragon vs. corsair II (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:43:26 -0400; I second that. I have a Paragon and an original Corsair. Both work fine. The Paragon has the advantage of general coverage receive and the convenience of keypad entry, but my preferred rig is the Cor; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00177.html (9,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]