Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+receiver\s+specifications\s+\-\-\-Eagle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+receiver\s+specifications\s+\-\-\-Eagle\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:31:19 -0500; It's cold outside, so let me grab the pull tab of a brand-new can of worms and yank it open. I know I'm not the sharpest knife int he drawer, and as the worms crawl out, I've been thinking of the Eag; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00364.html (7,800 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:05 -0600; If you want to count radios without any knobs as a radio, then the Eagle is I think otherwise it is #4 on the list. Many people, like myself, wouldn't want a radio with no knobs. Others love them. Wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00365.html (10,278 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:24:15 +0100; Receiver quality is a much more complex thing than, say, IM dynamic range. IM dynamic range is a kind of limit. Under specific circumstances, if the limit is not exceeded, the IM specification is irr; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00369.html (7,951 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:04:19 -0600; In casual operation you probably cannot tell the difference is the simple answer. In a pile-up you may be able to tell the difference. In a couple of recent contests I have been able to compare a FLE; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00378.html (10,432 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:06:37 -0600; Does anyone here have an informed opinion on how the Eagle and Omni VII compare on 6 meters? Currently I am running my Omni V.9 with an Elecraft transverter and a Mirage brick on 6. I also wonder how; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00381.html (8,071 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:31:22 -0500; I doubt it. Only in very extremely difficult cases, would any of them beat the other. On a day to day basis, all those figures should be largely irrelevant. Just MY take... == James - K8JHR == seven; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00406.html (8,005 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:51:33 -0600; Yep, Mike, The Atlas had a very good crystal filter, very sharp. Nice radio in its day, although primarily a SSB radio. Yes, the Icom 756 is wide as a barn door if you get a high powered signal too c; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00446.html (8,066 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]