Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\s+Scout\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\s+Scout\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] re Scout (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:51:48 -0400; Undetermined.... I've been popping them in and out for 13 years and no problems yet. W8AU/M _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00669.html (8,500 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] re Scout (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:17:43 -0500; Agreed, no band module failures that I have heard of and on the list for some time with lots of Scout owners. Sure, a ham fisted ham could abuse anything, but the band modules were well thought out.; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00677.html (7,049 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] re Scout (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:31:43 -0400; module failure? module failure?? nevah happened! (heh heh) Ron, wb1hga _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00678.html (7,219 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]