Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\s+Orion\s+II\s+thoughts\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:18:47 +0000
<<<On my list of "shoulda" for the Orion II is that it be a 200w rig. I like to be barefoot on CW and digital except for tough ones.>>> that's not likely to happen. Most TT customers don't seem to wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00067.html (8,636 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:41:00 -0600
And Omni V, Omni A, B, C, D, Paragon, Corsair I and II, and all vintage Tentec rigs with plug in filters, but not the Scout. How does 1/2 S unit help in most none threshold communications? 73, Jerry,
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00069.html (8,656 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:01:36 -0600
I agree that the 1/2 S-unit is a marginal benefit at best. Some amps won't drive to the legal limit with only 100W in. Or maybe it has to do with getting a full 2500 watts PEP out of those capable a
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00070.html (7,593 bytes)

4. [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:46:33 +0000
<<<> How does 1/2 S unit help in most none threshold communications? I agree that the 1/2 S-unit is a marginal benefit at best. Some amps won't drive to the legal limit with only 100W in. Or maybe it
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00072.html (8,804 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:15:28 -0500
I used to wonder what was so wonderful Paul Hanson is the authorized serice repairman for Icom. He also services Yaesu products like the Mark V. Paul stated to me he felt Icom and Yaesu should never
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00078.html (8,262 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Did the FCC make some more changes I did not see. Isn't the power output limit still 1500 watts PEP?!! George I agree that the 1/2 S-unit is a marginal benefit at best. Some amps won't drive to the l
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00083.html (8,451 bytes)

7. [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:29:22 +0000
Hi John, tell ur friend Paul the reason for the failures in the later 1000 yaesu rigs has nothing to do with the 200 w. PA or its design--in fact the mosfets used are extremely robust--the problem ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00085.html (8,993 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] re Orion II thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:58:45 -0500
Hi Rob, Paul is not my "friend". My dealings with him were from a professional level. I sent a Mark V to him to have it possibly repaired and as it turned out the rig was retired to the junk pile. Ro
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00089.html (9,346 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu