Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\:\s+Reciever\s+comparison\s+chart\s+on\s+website\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\:\s+Reciever\s+comparison\s+chart\s+on\s+website\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: khopper@uchicago.edu (Ken Hopper); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 08:56:58 -0600; There is a very interesting chart on the Elecraft web site that compares various rigs. The OmniVI+, Scout and Peg/Jupiter are compared with other contemporary rigs. Of course the purpose of the nice; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00072.html (8,157 bytes)
2. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 08:36:01 -0700; Ken, I use a long 362 foot long wire. My Pegasus suffers from overloading from a near 50KW AM at some times and a near 1KW ham. These two signals will overload my Pegasus so it can not be used on any; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00074.html (8,805 bytes)
3. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 09:58:35 -0800; Jim, Ken and all; In looking at the comparison chart, it's clear the K2 appears better. After all it's their chart. When I was with an electronics design and manufacturing company, our product always; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00076.html (10,120 bytes)
4. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:31:59 -0500; I believe the ARRL product review gave both the Elecraft K2 and the Ten-Tec Omni VI+ receivers very high marks. Just curious whether anyone out there owns both and has compared the K2 and VI+ receive; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00077.html (11,565 bytes)
5. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: k2qo@hotmail.com (Mark Adams, P.E.); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:19:33 -0500; Barry and gang, I think that W8JI has compared the K2 and Omni 6+ on 160M. At any rate, I email chatted with W1RFI who heads up the ARRL lab. He says that the devil is in the details of the test, not; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00078.html (8,596 bytes)
6. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: knoxm@scioto.net (Mike Knox - KC8WR); Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 22:25:41 -0500; Barry & All, I have both the K2 and an Omni VI Option 3 Upgrade. Although I can not get on 160.....a real postage stamp lot, I have used them side by side on everything else. 80 thru 10 and as much a; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00101.html (10,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]