Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+rE\-STRUCTURING\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+rE\-STRUCTURING\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] rE-STRUCTURING (score: 1): Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson); Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 06:54:59 -0500; As much as I agree with some of the statments and emotions regarding this recent change, One thing will never change, I converse in CW faster than my licence class requires now and after 4/15/2000. C; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-01/msg00003.html (7,585 bytes)
2. [TenTec] rE-STRUCTURING (score: 1): Author: pcuellar@bright.net (Phil Cuellar); Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 10:14:57 -0500; My 2 cents worth on restructuring: Treat the FCC like the weather. We can bitch about it, but we can't change it. I guess we will all just deal with it and move on. I'm not particularly thrilled with; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-01/msg00009.html (7,224 bytes)
3. [TenTec] rE-STRUCTURING (score: 1): Author: vsantis@javanet.com (Vincent A. Santis); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 18:19:22 -0500; Hi, Just a word on this subject, it seems to me that this change can and should serve as a motivator to those of us who have let our cw interest lag to get busy and sharpen our skill. If what we thin; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00695.html (6,933 bytes)
4. [TenTec] rE-STRUCTURING (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 18:37:08 -0500; Yeah, the good thing about CW ops is that you know they can all read and write, huh? 73 de Mike N4NT@wireco.net should get we -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tente; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00697.html (7,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]