Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+pair\s+of\s+INRAD\s+2\.8\s+filters\s+in\s+OMNI\s+VI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+pair\s+of\s+INRAD\s+2\.8\s+filters\s+in\s+OMNI\s+VI\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] pair of INRAD 2.8 filters in OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: turner@rome.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 19:13:19 -0800; Well, I got the other 2.8 KHz wide IF filter for the 6.3 MHz IF of my OMNI VI. Now I have a pair, one in the main line for each IF. It sounds better than the pair of 2.4's, and theoretically has bett; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00044.html (7,733 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]