Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+observations\s+of\s+my\s+Orion\s+with\s+V\s+1\.372\s+\(better\s+yet\s+1\.371\)\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:41:49 EST
With 2.0555, I hear no difference in noise no matter where the filter taps are set. If I set them as low as 32, the bandpass is too wide, and there is no difference in the noise. Advancing the NR to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00325.html (8,106 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:03:38 EST
Buck, Thanks for the update to us all. PLEASE sent all this to Dits n Bits if you have not already done so. Thanks agai. Unfortunately us OII owners are STUCK. we can not go back to 1.XXX at all. TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00326.html (7,039 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:58:29 EST
I do send my comments to D&B and all I ever get is their auto reply. TT would do themselves a favor if they engaged in this discussion. If there is something wrong with the NR reduction scheme in 1.3
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00327.html (8,492 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 07:45:54 -0800
Buck, those were exactly my observations with v1.371. I'd have S5 noise here in the city. The software NB would take it down a bit, the hardware NB would drop the noise a couple of S units and the NR
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00330.html (8,748 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:20:33 EST
Buck, Yep, that's all true. The manual never keeps up. DitsnBits DOES get the info and they do look at it. An Auto reply is normal for them. Unfortunately it is a one way street. I personally think t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00339.html (8,154 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:24:04 EST
Very disturbing... to take something that works pretty darn well in version 1.371 and comepletely screw it up,,,, WHY??? TT Why? Maybe Hams are not doing the testing? Lee, KC9CDT ____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00342.html (7,880 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu