Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+new\s+emissions\s+rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+new\s+emissions\s+rules\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 16:53:22 +0000; Generally speaking, the key clicks and the general hash most of us call phase noise (It's actually a mix of phase noise, partition noise, shot noise, Johnson noise, artifacts of multiple mixing, and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00224.html (8,023 bytes)
2. [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 12:17:19 -0500; Snip Generally speaking, the key clicks and the general hash most of us call phase noise (It's actually a mix of phase noise, partition noise, shot noise, Johnson noise, artifacts of multiple mixing,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00225.html (7,629 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 21:01:44 +0000; Yep, back in 1949 partition noise was defined as an instantanious shift in the relative currents in the elements of a vacuum tube. Circa 1963 anologous shifts in current flow occuring in solid state; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00228.html (7,604 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 18:44:54 EDT; I can't believe they ( FCC) are worried about the clicks etc that all of you are speaking of here... WHEN THEY WILL LET ALL OF THAT BROADBAND INTERFERENCE HAPPEN WITH BPL, EVEN THOUGH IT IS STILL IN; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00231.html (7,040 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 18:32:05 -0500; Thanks for the info regarding paritition noise as it applies to solid state devices I was under the false impression that partition noise was generated only by boat anchors! Since Ten Tec is primaril; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00232.html (8,953 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 00:22:08 +0000; Well, partition noise is not a major contributor to TX noise. But it's still there - along with all the other classic noise sources I learned about between WWII and the "Korean Police Action," as wel; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00234.html (9,163 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] new emissions rules (score: 1): Author: "w3sz" <w3sz@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 06:49:59 -0400; Hello, All! I believe there was some brief discussion in this forum recently about what Leif, SM5BSZ, has to say about / showed about transmitter noise and a variety of commercial rigs currently in u; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00242.html (10,939 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]