Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+microphones\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+microphones\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Wed Jan 22 09:59:53 2003; Can someone explain the differences between the new Heil microphones, the Studio One (in the TenTec ad on page 19 of the February 2003 QST) and the Heil Proline (in the Heil ad on page 7 - same QST)?; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00519.html (6,895 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: K3YD@aol.com (K3YD@aol.com); Date: Wed Jan 22 10:18:57 2003; << Can someone explain the differences between the new Heil microphones, the Studio One (in the TenTec ad on page 19 of the February 2003 QST) and the Heil Proline (in the Heil ad on page 7 - same QS; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00520.html (7,130 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ); Date: Wed Jan 22 12:52:35 2003; Here's what I found on the Heil and TT websites. First, the Heil page with the specs on the Proline: Generating Element: Dynamic Body: Mate Steel body is zinc die cast Frequency Response: 40 to 18,00; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00522.html (8,076 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK); Date: Wed Jan 22 13:40:48 2003; I have been using a Heil HM-10 dual element microphone with my Jupiter and it has been fantastic. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that the Heil Microphones are designed to be "close talked" at; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00523.html (7,736 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Wed Jan 22 18:56:56 2003; The proper technique with any shape mike is to speak Across the element, rather than directly into it for maximum shortwave radio intelligibility. Although the Heil Classic looks like a differing mik; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00524.html (6,969 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed Jan 22 21:59:13 2003; Mark: Heil mikes......., the basic difference is in overall frequency response, at what frequency and the amount of the peak in audio response occurs, where the roll-off, both on the high end and low; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00526.html (11,447 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: nw4p@xtn.net (Richard Robinson); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:04:19 -0800; Thanks for all the replys. Shure makes a 104A and Astatic makes a D104. Now I need the wiring for the amplified D104.Anybody got = it. Thanks again everybody, Richard -- StripMime Report -- processed; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00248.html (6,550 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: ARDUJENSKI@aol.com (ARDUJENSKI@aol.com); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:30:03 EST; D-104 wiring diagram <A HREF="http://www.qsl.net/kb8wow/Mics_Preamps_Page3.html">Click here: KB8WOW - Notebook - Microphone Preamps - Page 3</A> Alan KB7MBI in Woodinville, WA FISTS 5702 Proud member; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00251.html (6,756 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: N4NT@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:55:00 -0500; Here's a link that works: http://www.qsl.net/kb8wow/Mics_Preamps_Page3.html 73, Mike N4NT KB8WOW - Notebook - Microphone Preamps - Page 3</A>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00253.html (7,607 bytes)
10. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 22:40:51 -0500; I think we have found the next dead horse. My question is will any of these microphones stay on frequency or will they drift? 73 Paul K9OT; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00143.html (7,038 bytes)
11. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (William Mansey; WA2PVK); Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 23:55:41 -0400; My microphones seem to stay pretty close to being on frequency most of the time. The only time they are not on frequency is when they ARE on frequency as is frequently the case although there seems t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00144.html (7,497 bytes)
12. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester); Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 06:46:52 -0400; Paul...you must be a rank novice to pose a question such as that!! We all know that you control frequency drift by the way we speak into the microphone...the rig will drift down if you talk across th; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00146.html (8,097 bytes)
13. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: wa2tti@qsl.net (Jerry Harley); Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 07:56:57 -0400; Paul, I believe it depends on the element and the volume of the case. If the case is a least 4 times the size of the element it will probably be OK, but lets run some lab tests. Jerry; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00147.html (7,564 bytes)
14. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: N4NT@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:02:31 -0400; To lessen the effects of thermal drift, it is important to wear a glove when using a microphone. Mike N4NT Paul, I believe it depends on the element and the volume of the case. If the case is a least; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00149.html (7,717 bytes)
15. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 08:38:06 -0500; The only time I've experienced "microphone drift" is when my wife accidentally dropped and left a sewing pin in my chair. I sat down and yes the voice did go up in frequency and volume...........cons; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00150.html (8,452 bytes)
16. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: scott@wowpage.com (Scott Johnson); Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:01:37 -0400; So THAT'S why Michael Jackson always wore one glove. 'DCY -- Scott Johnson (scott@wowpage.com) (s.johnson@klotzdigital.com) ICQ: 30730876 ICBM: N33 45 50.6 W84 49 31.3 (+- 3dB); /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00151.html (7,297 bytes)
17. [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:51:22 -0400; A real D-104 would have acted like a time-machine, transporting you back to 1934 when it was tied to home brew 3 stage rig with big glowing bottles, sitting beside a two stage regen feeding headphone; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00161.html (7,209 bytes)
18. Fw: [TenTec] microphones (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:16:48 -0500; the To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00165.html (8,666 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: WmLB@prefer.net (WmLB@prefer.net); Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 19:24:14 -0800; I don't want to start the mic discussion all over.. but.. I was wondering if Ten-Tec has ever produced a mic suitable for a "boom" type of installation. I really don't like hand-helds or desk mics wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00081.html (6,607 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: wa2tti@worldlynx.net (Jerry Harley); Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 18:27:03 -0500; I'd like to know what microphones Pegasus & Jupiter users are finding the best? How about speech processors? 234? I've seen very few comments on the Jupiter and Pegasus. Only 19 members of the Pegasu; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00702.html (7,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]