Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+gas\s+on\s+the\s+fire\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+gas\s+on\s+the\s+fire\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1): Author: "Paul DeWitte" <k9ot@yousq.net>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:47:02 -0500; I have been reading the posts about verticals VS dipoles, and S meters. First, I think that if you modeled a ground mounted vertical and the same vertical at 330 feet above ground, you might find the; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00275.html (7,400 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:00:48 -0400; This makes sense to me. Can the NEC-based modeling programs do that ? They seem to consider different ground conditions... but what if ground is 350 feet away ? Good question. More of the mysteries o; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00279.html (9,142 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1): Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:56:04 -0400; My experience is as a self taught student still learning about how the NEC models work and I am also trying to move from EXNEC to 4NEC2. What I am really trying to say here is that if someone else se; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00283.html (10,912 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1): Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 02:50:06 +0000 (GMT+00:00); John, The modeling software packages do take into consideration various ground parameters. Look carefully and you will see there are typically several "types" of grounds to select depending on the so; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00287.html (15,524 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]