Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eme\:\s+Omni\s+D\s+vs\s+vi\+\s+DSP\,\s+wondering\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eme\:\s+Omni\s+D\s+vs\s+vi\+\s+DSP\,\s+wondering\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] eme: Omni D vs vi+ DSP, wondering... (score: 1): Author: jdvoracek@vvm.com (John Dvoracek); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 12:10:54 -0500; This may not be the best forum, but I don't know of any others. I used a pre-DSP Omni D, series B, with a transverter for serious weak signal vhf work in the 1980's. I had a small eme station with 4; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00056.html (8,015 bytes)
2. [TenTec] eme: Omni D vs vi+ DSP, wondering... (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 11:36:40 -0500; My DSP-59+ can't actually dig signals out that I can't hear already, but it sure makes them more pleasant to copy if there's any detectable signal at all. And it reduces that fatigue of listening to; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00057.html (7,606 bytes)
3. [TenTec] eme: Omni D vs vi+ DSP, wondering... (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:40:21 -0500; When I first started with DSP on my IC-765, I *could* copy signals with the original Timewave DSP-9 that I couldn't copy without it. This was with or without the ICOM 500 Hz filters cascaded. It woul; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00059.html (8,430 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]