- 1. [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:37:25 -0800 (PST)
- The only thing I really ever read at eHam are the Product Reviews. I think the contributions from so many ham reviewers over the years should stay in the public domain. Sure W4AN can solicit for cont
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00323.html (7,115 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Higgins" <RHIGGINS1@CFL.RR.COM>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:58:51 -0500
- Hmm... Noble concern for underprivliged hams world-wide. Maybe an interested party should start up a ham equipment review only website. 73 Bob K4LW . _______________________________________________ T
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00327.html (7,820 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
- Author: jsb@digistar.com
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:36:32 -0500 (EST)
- That wouldn't be too hard. I built something kinda like that on a lark in a couple days. http://dining.digistar.com/ I don't feel too comfortable trying to replicate eham's reviews site because they
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00330.html (7,400 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
- Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:34:49 -0600
- Just rejoined the reflector since I ordered my Orion (still wondering whether to keep or sell the Omni VI+). Now I remember why I dropped my subscription earlier. The noise level on here is unbelieva
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00347.html (7,460 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:46:04 -0600
- One thing to consider, the "wait" for an Orion is about 2 months. You might want to keep your old rig until the new one arrives and you are convinced that you are satisfied with it. Welcome aboard, d
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00354.html (8,424 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu