Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eHam\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+eHam\!\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:39:06 -0800 (PST); Hi Guys, I agreee with Carl that eham should get some monetary assistence but I think you can hit the "BACK" button on your browser when you see the "Please Subscribe" page then re-select and view. G; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00308.html (7,129 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:53:43 -0800; Hi Don, I tried that (actually the "Refresh" button - but most of the reviews are still clearly marked in yellow: "Subscribers Only". Sayonara, eHam. Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ Hi Guys, I a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00310.html (7,430 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:05:18 -0500; Trouble is...eHam just devalued their site for the paying product advertisers too. The Product Reviews are (were) a good hook to get folks onto the site. Also, an argument can be made that hams were; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00311.html (8,726 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Robert Higgins" <RHIGGINS1@CFL.RR.COM>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:06:23 -0500; Have you sent your donation yet? If the site is of no value to you, you need not offer any monetary support. If it does have value to you, then pay for it accordingly. Do you do only volunteer work,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00312.html (7,616 bytes)
5. [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:19:03 -0800 (PST); RE: [TenTec] eHam! from [Adam Farson] [Permanent Link][Original] Oh, I see now. They let you into the review of the rig you are interested in, show you the last user review, then hold the user review; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00313.html (7,803 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:28:37 -0600; Advertisers apparently didn't want to pay up for the bandwidth increases... This is a common difficulty with the hobby web sites... old addage, pick any of the following two, Good Fast Cheap Works ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00316.html (8,474 bytes)
7. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:18:43 +0000; Well, TANSTAFFL. There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch! Never has been, never will be. And yes, there were several saloonkeepers in the ancestry. But even in those days the drinkers who feasted o; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00319.html (10,446 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Bill KB9IV" <wmarvin@mnic.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:21:38 -0600; I just went to the eHam site and other than a "Subscription ran out 11/20/03" I had full access to everything. Apparently those who had donated in the previous year like myself were not greeted with; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00320.html (10,523 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:25:29 -0600; Got a message back that the advertiseres weren't approached for increases in advertising, pehaps we should ask eham to do so. 73's Rich K5SF increases... _____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00321.html (10,403 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:31:29 -0800 (PST); Also, an argument can be made that hams were not paid for submitting their views and comments and now those same views hold enough value to charge for them. Yes. Great point. I posted several reviews; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00322.html (8,069 bytes)
11. [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:19:02 -0500; The trouble with eHam.net, and it's not new, is that the web site does not recognize subscribers. I send in dough at least once a year, but I still have had to zap the subscription plea that pops up; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00328.html (8,298 bytes)
12. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:41:26 -0600; Well, For me, E-mails to eham's people have been responded to, Changed my call sign and they handled it just fine. They even transferred the flag that said I was a subscriber... But there may be some; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00331.html (9,624 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:51:21 -0500; Pay content will be the death of the web. Most ISPs just don't get it, even though free content built the internet customer base that butters their bread. Business should pay and do. Internet subscri; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00335.html (8,200 bytes)
14. [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Don Rasmussen <wb8yqj@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:31:54 -0800 (PST); Hi Guys, Thanks to N1EU and some others, eHam.Net reviews are once again available without subscription. Barry's excellent Orion review is a great read - and free, free again at last! ;-) 73, de WB8Y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00474.html (7,796 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:22:31 EST; BUT, Read the web masters post, not free forever??? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00478.html (7,383 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:30:59 -0800 (PST); Please tell me what IS free forever? I can't believe you even asked the question.....but then again if you read what some people expect that is posted on eHam. . . . . Kc9cdt@aol.com wrote: BUT, Read; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00485.html (8,348 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:37:08 EST; It was not a question, just a comment that yep it's free again for now, but who knows for how long. Personally I will contribute the $15 /yr. I think it's worth it. 73, Lee __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00487.html (7,765 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:40:25 -0800 (PST); Great! If you read some of the posts, folks believe it should be free!? Personally I will contribute the $15 /yr. I think it's worth it. 73, Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00488.html (8,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]