Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+digital\s+triton\s+IV\s+qsk\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+digital\s+triton\s+IV\s+qsk\s+issue\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] digital triton IV qsk issue (score: 1): Author: "Mark Choate" <aa0yy@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:24:52 -0600; I have owned both an analog triton and a digital one now. the digital units qsk is by far slower than the analog. can anyone tell me if there is an adjustment I can tweak to improve the qsk rx recove; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00188.html (7,393 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] digital triton IV qsk issue (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike.hyder.n4nt@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:03:22 -0500; Hi, Mark-- I've never compared the analog with the digital but for me the digital was just fine for QSK. Maybe I'm not a purist? About that "drop out delay time" adjustment: the rigs have a larger re; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00200.html (8,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]