Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+comparing\s+ten\s+tec\s+transceivers\s+to\s+ten\s+tec\s+transceivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+comparing\s+ten\s+tec\s+transceivers\s+to\s+ten\s+tec\s+transceivers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] comparing ten tec transceivers to ten tec transceivers (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:03:31 -0400; hola.. yesterday I had some extra goof off time in the shack. I connected my Jupiter, Argonaut V and an old Ten Tec Delta II to the same antenna via a coax switch. I found a weak signal on 18.156.10; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00244.html (8,322 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] comparing ten tec transceivers to ten tec transceivers (score: 1): Author: Tom Badgett <tbadgett@synergysouth.com>; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:09:41 -0400; Interesting comparison. I don't have other Ten Tec (or anything else) to compare with right now, but I do know that my Argo V receiver seems really hot. The last rig I owned was an old Icom 735 and t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00247.html (9,995 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] comparing ten tec transceivers to ten tec transceivers (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:43:38 -0500; All this goes back to the phase noise introduced by PLL circuits and the steps we've gone through to reduce it. Having owned a pair of OMNI-Ds with the same low noise reciever, it's hard to adjust to; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00257.html (11,690 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]