Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+a\s+question\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+a\s+question\:\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:24:19 -0700; a friend, ham radio op and commercial radio tech, suggested that solid state amps are "cleaner" than tube amps. is that "generally" true? thanks jack ak7o ____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00545.html (7,338 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:33:34 EST; I suppose if you figure tube rigs have been around many years longer than solid state rig, they probably are cleaner due to less exposure to dirt , dust and smoke. :) in truth it is just dependent on; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00546.html (7,978 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "David H. Walker" <k0cop@onlymyemail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 19:52:31 +0000; Cleaner meaning?? Most of the great audio amps in the world are still tube types. There is a big reason for that in IMHO> 73 David -- David H. Walker K0cop Aiken, SC _________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00547.html (7,725 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:54:37 -0700; very good. well said, jack _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00548.html (8,738 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:55:04 -0700; thank you, jack _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00549.html (8,314 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:10:25 -1000; a friend, ham radio op and commercial radio tech, suggested that solid state amps are "cleaner" than tube amps. is that "generally" true? There are several reasons why a tube amplifier is more likely; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00551.html (8,708 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:15:08 -0700; thank you, jack _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00563.html (9,872 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:30:57 -0600; As long as they are operated in their linear bias range, yes. Otherwise, they get real nasty and real fast. Tube amps have a much softer bias knee. 73 Bob, K4TAX _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00568.html (8,627 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:59:10 -0700; thank you, i thot that to be the case. jack _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00614.html (9,683 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:17:43 -1000; If you peruse the schematics of solid state RF PAs versus tube RF PAs, you will find the the bias control circuitry is the most complex part of the SS amp, often requiring more square inches of circu; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00615.html (8,779 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] a question: (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:18:35 -0700; thank you, jack _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00622.html (9,704 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]