Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Yaesu\s+FT9000\s+oversights\s+in\s+QST\s+review\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Zivney, Terry L." <00tlzivney@bsu.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:55:52 -0500
I noticed two other points not editorially mentioned in the QST review of the latest Click-meister rig. Figure 5 in that review shows very sharp rise and fall times; although the text says that menu
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00162.html (7,455 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:13:37 -0000
Which book is that? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00166.html (9,401 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:13:02 GMT
Has QST ever panned something advertised in their magzine? Be Well, Tim colbert K3HX ___________________________________________________________________ Get Juno Platinum for as low as $6.95/month! U
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00169.html (7,586 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: Mike Manship <mjmanship@iquest.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:00:51 -0500
Quoting "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>: The Maxcom antenna tuner. I am well. Mike Manship W9OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00180.html (7,770 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 01:08:20 GMT
It was not advertised in QST. Glad you are well, Tim The Maxcom antenna tuner. I am well. Mike Manship W9OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00184.html (8,411 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:29:34 -0400
Yes, I remember that antenna. It was a broadband dipole that had transformers and resistors built into the center insulator. QST actually x-rayed and disassembled the potted assembly. Some of the cir
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00192.html (9,248 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:10:25 -0500
These guys are still very much in business, selling very expensive dummy loads -- uh -- ah -- sorry, "automatic" Antenna Tuners. The name has been changed to protect the innocent (or guilty, dependi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00193.html (8,130 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Many times. MFJ's digital interface comes to mind. One model received a scathing review. 73, Caity K7VO Caitlyn M. Martin - K7VO http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/k7vo Blog: http://k7vo.blogspot.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00198.html (8,906 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:13:55 -0400
Its a mystery to me why hams would go for a broadband antenna of any kind, when a dipole fed with ladder line and used with a decent tuner (auto or manual) is cheaper and more efficient. Yet, I const
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00226.html (10,878 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
I agree! Ladder line works great, been there done that. It also radiates like crazy and if you are in close proximity to miserable neighbors, ladder line is not desirable fed line. If you live where
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00228.html (12,031 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: W3UIO <amishbuggy37@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Yep. A number of years ago, when Heathkit was going strong, a kit under review was determined to have a serious flaw. (I don't remember which product, but maybe someone else will.) Heath flew two eng
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00235.html (9,443 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:00:14 -0400
A similar thing happened with the Paragon. QST found a problem with phase noise. Ten Tec promptly came up with a mod that was tried and reported in the review. 73, Bob WB2VUF ________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00238.html (10,003 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy-W4BQF" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:41:05 -0400
Curt, You may want to revisit your 'been there done that' thing. If you open wire feeder radiated, that was because you had an imbalance in your antenna some how. Two wires carrying V/I 180 degrees o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00286.html (14,888 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
I remember an old timer telling me that on a ladder line fed antenna the fed line was part of the radiation system, but when reading all the worldly knowledge on this reflector I see this Ot-er must
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00302.html (16,962 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:31:08 -0400
Of course, one must not forget that, feedline notwithstanding, the antenna Does radiate (we all hope). So I guess maybe 5kw 5 feet away from anything whatsoever might be a problem. Now on the other h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00305.html (19,290 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu