Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Would\s+like\s+Corsair\s+II\s+comments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Would\s+like\s+Corsair\s+II\s+comments\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 18:10:24 -0400; Uh....why not just look at the schematic ? That will show what is done where. (I don't have one handy, or I'd be more helpful and answer the question directly) Gary AA2IZ; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00013.html (9,098 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 18:17:32 -0400; They are discussing 'why' the circuitry is as it is, not what it is. Mike done the From: "N1EU" <n1eu@yahoo.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00014.html (9,397 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 18:36:16 -0400; Well, perhaps I simply missed the point after all :) I saw comments like "I think, I believe, I always thought" and so forth and assumed that meant people didn't know for sure. If my assumption was i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00017.html (11,356 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: Tim English" <te@usol.com (Tim English); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:44:29 -0400; Hello, I am new to this list and am about to become the proud owner of a = Corsair II and would like to hear some comments good or bad on anyone = elses experience with this rig. I did alot of review; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00764.html (8,514 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:50:59 -0400; Tim: Just curious. To what do you attribute the deafness of the IC-706 compared to the 509? We all know that the 706 will beat the Argo on the test bench so what makes it so hot? Is it the lack of no; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00766.html (9,355 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:54:06 -0500; I see reports that the Corsair II is noisy. It just has lots of gain but the RF stage uses circuitry that should be very quiet. Practically quiet enough for VHF/UHF without a significant preamp. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00767.html (9,258 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 03:01:07 -0700 (PDT); I don't find the Corsair's rf/if chain noisey. However there's quite a handful of op-amps between the product detector and LM383 audio amp that sure don't help. That's why I amplify the audio externa; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00769.html (8,939 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 03:13:30 -0700 (PDT); I should have mentioned in my previous posting that my comments are based on my experience with the Corsair I, not the Corsair II. I believe the rf/if/af circuits are just about identical except for; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00770.html (8,247 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:35:54 -0400; Gerald: Just curious about the filter delay comment. I always thought the delay was in the audio/agc circuit which caused it not to respond as fast as it should. Also can you comment on why you think; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00773.html (10,784 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: wa2tti@worldlynx.net (Jerry Harley); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:58:12 -0400; Your going to love it. I sold mine to finance part of the Jupiter. Since then I have picked up a Corsair with the 8 pole filter in the front end. Pretty much the same as the II. Bottom line, don't gi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00774.html (9,640 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:01:28 -0000; I believe they used audio derived AGC to get the audio notch in the AGC loop. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From: <n4lq@iglou.com> To: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical e; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00775.html (11,905 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 05:43:47 -0700 (PDT); I think Carl and Steve are both correct. The audio-derived AGC scheme seems to have continued from the Triton to the Omni and finally to the Corsair. Depending on the rig, there was an audio notch fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00777.html (8,999 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:19:55 -0500; Since the RF envelope and the audio envelope in SSB do not correspond, audio derived AGC tends to produce a smoother audio output. (Its analogous to audio clipping versus SSB RF clipping, where the f; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00778.html (11,315 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:48:55 -0400; Well, I like my Corsair II. Prior to that I used and still use the Triton 544, the Omni-C and a little Argosy2. At first the increase in noise from the Corsair II troubled me, but by reducing the RF; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00780.html (9,662 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:17:20 -0000; Tentec's first transceiver with IF derived AGC was the Paragon. That was followed by the Omni V. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From: "N1EU" <n1eu@yahoo.com> To: <tentec@co; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00781.html (9,905 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:31:47 -0400; First of all Tim, in my mind the CorsairII is a "keeper". And I am one of those who actually like the operation of the hang AGC. I much prefer the hang action to AGC that is constantly changing the g; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00782.html (10,197 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:03:15 -0400; Further to below message. . . All my comments about any rig pertain only to its use on CW. I work nothing else. Mike N4NT in other not From: "Tim English" <te@usol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> of; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00792.html (10,146 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]