Author: n9vv@wideopenwest.com (Ken Hopper Amateur Radio N-9-V-V)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:39:39 -0600
check it out guys!!! "A Ten-Tec Orion transceiver was used on the U.S. side of the world's first two-way transatlantic digital voice contact via Amateur Radio." ...."A Jupiter was used on the French
Great! More digital noise in the bands. Just what we need! achieved a To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
With a sentiment like what I think that comment represents, it is amazing that we still have any bands at all to operate anymore!!! Ponder: Circa 1955 - "Great! More Donald Duck noise in the bands. J
i think this will be great for ham radio. There will be a lot of interesting fallout during any implementation. Other digital formats, like Nextel's, running adjacent channels to Public Service alloc
Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:06:04 -0500
Well... I hafta put my two cents into this one... Digital modes CAN be very efficient and very effective in their use of spectrum. Consider PSK31 for instance, where you can have several "conversatio
Darn. I was hoping that it wouldn't interfere with my spark gap like that new fangled AM voice stuff has been doing. And has anyone heard the crap that guy Armstrong came up with? It's terrible. That
It's not the digital waveforms that are the problem, it's the implementation thereof. The first one that comes to mind is Pactor III, which has been making a mess of the 14060 kHz region. is passed,
'All else equal' ;-) I like that... Higher symbol rate => higher bandwidth amplitude(above noise) product. I've been told by a guy who attends the standards committee meetings for 'cellular telephony