- 1. [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:38:38 +0200
- I hope Barry is right. Although we've been through all of this before, we are all a bit farther down the road than we were a year ago. I don't have much use for a band scope, but understand and accep
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00137.html (10,993 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: P C A <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:02:38 -0400
- Great ideas RICK. I like the modular concept, and what you want when you want. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00139.html (12,819 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 08:23:43 -0400
- Rick, This is all too outdated a way to make a transceiver now. The new best way is to create 100% digital data right at the antenna connection. Then everything is done in software. The new Flex 6500
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00140.html (12,071 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:27:32 +0000
- Nicely spec'd Rick. I would add: don't undersize the radio and give up ergonomics in the process. For example, the Orion's VFO/ANT switch matrix (lower left) is genius. If anything, give it more real
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00141.html (14,349 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 05:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
- I agree Carl. Hardware is too expensive these days, it's gone the way of how labor use to be cheap, and now it isn't. it'll be minimal hardware, and a nexus of software. 73, -Eric W9WLW http://w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00142.html (14,935 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:22:44 +0000
- Inexpensive DDC/DUC hardware eh? Any idea what the Xilinx XC6VLX130T FPGA chip that is used in the Flex 6700 goes for? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00143.html (15,934 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:40:10 +0200
- Carl, Yes AND NO! For all of us operating at home (alone), YES. At least as far as technology goes. Not sure if operator acceptance is there yet. But, for a Field Day, especially a larger club with 5
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00144.html (11,803 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:41:05 +0200
- Plus the cost of a suitable computer required to drive it to full specs! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Inexpensive DDC/DUC hardware eh? Any idea what the Xilinx XC6VLX130T FPGA chip that i
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00145.html (16,333 bytes)
- 9. [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:08:32 -0400
- Very good discussion. In my opinion, eventually, SDR type transceivers will probably be the norm from all manufacturers. But I believe that there will still be a market in the amateur market and the
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00146.html (11,172 bytes)
- 10. [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:22:42 -0400
- dabgum it, in the paragraph on the SDRs.... Meant to say..... That if you can add I&Q outputs, you DON'T need the external SDRs. providing of course the quality level is good enough for the sound car
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00147.html (8,042 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 16:37:42 +0200
- "One thing we have to do is to keep in mind the differing requirements from many different levels of ham usages. Quite varied." Which is why you make it modular... - Rick ____________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00148.html (7,241 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Brian Mullaney <bpm@lintech.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:42:38 -0400
- On 4/8/2014 8:23 AM, Carl Moreschi wrote: This is all too outdated a way to make a transceiver now. The new best way is to create 100% digital data right at the antenna connection. Then everything is
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00149.html (9,425 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:46:30 -0400
- NO the 6500 does not behave like the 5000. The 6500 has a clip point of S9 + 80 DB. That's a HUGE signal. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com For all of us operating at
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00150.html (12,710 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:56:23 +0000
- I suspect that the DDC/DUC market will evolve with 3rd parties offering add-on virtual front panels that hang off the PC or the rig as peripherals, or perhaps hang off the network. You're probably no
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00151.html (9,126 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "73@73.am" <73@73.am>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:01:17 -0500
- One can install Michelin tires on a Yugo, but it will still not handle like a Mercedes. -Paul _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00152.html (7,947 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:14:40 +0200
- You may very well be correct, Carl. Rob hasn't sent me any data on the 6500 yet. I was assuming its performance and behavior will be in the ballpark of the 5000. Just shows to go ya, assumptions are
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00153.html (14,633 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:01:05 -0400
- I have now fully integrated the Woodbox radio Tmate2 with all my software. The Tmate2 has 3 knobs and 9 buttons and you can choose from a list of over 60 functions to set for each control. Additional
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00156.html (15,570 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Steven Kline <skline4@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:43:28 -0500
- John Henry, All the discussion on these great features and more this past week, resurected one particular feature that Ive lost touch with from Ten Tec - the external high definition pan adapter vide
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00157.html (13,084 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 22:22:25 +0200
- Excellent. That is exactly the POD I had in mind when I wrote that! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) I have now fully integrated the Woodbox radio Tmate2 with all my software. The Tmate2 has
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00162.html (18,143 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
- Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:10:22 -0500
- I won't buy a high end radio that is point and click...just ain't happening. Full front panel...stand alone from a separate computer. Guess i am old school and I don't expect it to change. Don't care
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00168.html (20,679 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu