Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Was\s+I\s+bad\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Was\s+I\s+bad\?\?\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:30:04 -0500; Good morning folks, I have not seen any replies to my posts, the last one asking if any one has tried the TT 715 speech processor with older TT radios. If I did something wrong or offended any one, I; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00515.html (7,802 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:34:44 -0600 (CST); Tell you what... buy me a 715, and I'll let you know how it works on my Corsair. Just give me a month or two. I don't think it will do much on my PM-2B though. Just a hunch. 73 Good morning folks, I; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00516.html (8,269 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:36:28 -0500; TNX Ron, I might try one on my TT 526 AKA 6n2 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00517.html (9,168 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0600; Philip, Maybe no one has :) I have the older 234 so I wouldn't know, but I doubt that there is a lot of difference electrically. AFAIK the new one is an RF processor just as the old one is. -- Neal,; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00518.html (8,662 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:38:31 -0600; Phil/Andy, It should work just fine as it is essentially the same circuitry as the older 234 that was analog. I've used both and they work quite well at increasing average talk power. Mike, k5wmg Pip; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00519.html (9,328 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:49:16 -0500; TNX Mike _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00520.html (9,992 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:50:08 -0500; TNX for your reply Neal _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00521.html (9,403 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Carl Winkles <jcwinks@att.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:55:34 -0800 (PST); I have used a model 715 with a Paragon II. It works just fine. Carl, K4SEV Good morning folks, I have not seen any replies to my posts, the last one asking if any one has tried the TT 715 speech pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00524.html (8,434 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:23:15 -0500; TU Carl _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00525.html (9,787 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:46:06 -0600; Phil, The 715 works on ANY TT SSB radio. You will need to choose a specific cable to connect with your transceiver's microphone connector and may need a mic adapter for your microphone to terminate o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00526.html (9,789 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:48:20 -0500; TNX much Gary, may give it a try. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00527.html (10,736 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:17:44 -0500; Gary; Thank you for that report. I run my Paragon and Corsair barefoot with modest wire antennas, so I think that the 715 might help a bit. 73, Bob WB2VUF ____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00550.html (11,167 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:03:53 +0000 (UTC); Bob, By all means grab one of the 715's. I ran 2 OMNI VI+'s barefoot into a 160M dipole at about 60 ft. Seldom used SSB, but when I did, I got walked over. TenTec had a reduced price on a demo unit (; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00554.html (11,943 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:19:20 -0500; TU for the info. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00558.html (13,188 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:38:38 -0500; I second the admonition to tune it carefully. A little goes a long way and it is easy to push it to far, which introduces distortion that cancels the helpful boost effect. Bob K4TAX has put up some n; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00560.html (9,274 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:00:31 -0500; Thanks, I think I might go for it. The audio processors in my Paragon and Corsair don't seem to do much. Would an audio generator or 'scope be helpful in setting it up? 73, Bob WB2VUF _______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00561.html (10,561 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:41:11 -0500; Gee... I am not technically proficient enough to answer that. I believe it is sufficient if you are just careful not to overdo it, and a reliable audio report should be sufficient to accomplish the t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00567.html (9,325 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]