Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+WAS\:\s+Omni\s+6\s+Logic\s+board\s+failure\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:26:07 -0600
Yesterday I talked to a couple of people at Ten-Tec about the logic board situation. The bottom line was: There was really nothing that could be done as it was a "combination of things" that could ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00444.html (9,765 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:41:57 -0600 (CST)
It sounds to me that the solution would be for a third party to design, build, and stock a replacement logic board. Easier said than done. I don't know how much information is still available on the
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00445.html (10,429 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:14:19 -0600
Hi Ron, I'm happy that other people are thinking about this! It's complicated. Whew! That's quite a task, and as you alluded to, but I don't imagine the company would be interested in helping - and t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00446.html (9,957 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:18:59 +0200
The real problem is the development cost. The cost of designing the board, writing the software if needed, building a prototype, testing it in a radio and then translating all of that to production i
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00447.html (10,085 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:38:05 -0500
in 2002 my dad got a folder from ten tec with brochures for Jupiter,onmi6 and the Titan amp.2002 from 2011 is 9 years. Hi Ron, I'm happy that other people are thinking about this! It's complicated. W
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00448.html (10,584 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:54:32 -0600 (CST)
Hi Neal, Well, as a "new" (to me) owner of an Omni VI since last fall, of course this is of more than academic interest to me. I like this rig! I'd hate to see it become nothing more than a paperweig
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00449.html (11,702 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:10:11 +0000
Yes, the last Omni 6+ was sold 9 years ago but the architecture was designed 20 years ago when the Omni 6 was being developed. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00450.html (8,210 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:24:26 -0600
Ron, I have not had mine for years and years, either. In fact, I waited a long time for one reason or another to get one of these. When they first came out I went through quite a WOW factor experienc
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00451.html (13,950 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:55:09 -0600
I believe the most significant result of this discussion thread has been the development of possible failures on the logic board as well as the fixes. Knowing to replace the battery and ICs in order
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00452.html (14,733 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:59:26 -0500
Hummm, who's to say ten years down the road, or sooner, the Omni VII doesn't have a logic board problem? mike bryce wb8vge prosolar@sssnet.com _______________________________________________ TenTec m
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00453.html (9,174 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:23:34 -0600
Actually there are commercially available boards for connecting surface mount parts to DIP PC boards, one IC at a time. That works a lot of the time because the makers didn't change the number of pin
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00454.html (10,025 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:57:50 -0600
Right. Which gets us to the basic question everyone has to answer for themselves if any of this bothers them: Am I willing to pay for a throw away plastic rig in order to get all kinds of cool extras
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00457.html (10,491 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:40:02 -0800
The advantage of the older, tube-based radios is that they were designed with discrete components, most of which are available today. No custom CPUs or ICs. It's a known fact that, in electronic equi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00458.html (11,248 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:16:14 -0600
Mike, You are probably right, but I don't believe I'm going to be overly concerned if it does. The OMNI-VII is a great radio; I believe for my use, after learning to operate it, that its better than
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00459.html (11,318 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:11:49 -0500 (EST)
"Am I willing to pay for a throw away plastic rig in order to get all kinds of cool extras to play with..." Since I own an Omni VII, my answer is evidently "yes", though didn't buy it to get cool ext
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00460.html (9,587 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: NL7VL <neal.laugman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:03:16 -0600
I had to laugh at you final remark. A good friend of mine in Eagle, AK once gave me a really cool mil-surplus xtal cw transceiver. I asked him why he would just give me the rig he had coveted for so
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00461.html (11,129 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:13:02 -0500
Hmmmmm...Maybe I should keep the 2 2B's and sell the Jupiter....then again maybe not. Truth is, I find recently that I am spending as much time operating with the Argosy set at 5 W. Good audio, prett
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00467.html (10,678 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu