Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Vertical\s+Dipole\s+for\s+80\/160m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Vertical\s+Dipole\s+for\s+80\/160m\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Vertical Dipole for 80/160m (score: 1): Author: "Barrett Thompson" <barrettthompson@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:21:12 -0500; The discussion about vertical dipoles has been very enlightening. For some time I've been eyeing the following vertical dipole (that's what it really is, even though the author calls it a Double-L) f; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00168.html (7,891 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole for 80/160m (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:32:39 -0500 (EST); You can. One version of that is called an inverted-L, or "Marconi," and has been around for quite a while. I've got one. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 1/7/2011 8:21:33 P.M. GMT Standard Time, barret; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00169.html (7,804 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole for 80/160m (score: 1): Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:45:52 -0800 (PST); There's at least one company that markets vertical dipoles: Force 12. I have their Sigma 80, which is an off-center-fed vertical dipole. It seems to work quite well, though it doesn't do well at all; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00172.html (9,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]