Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ver\s+2\.0\s+is\s+the\s+key\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ver\s+2\.0\s+is\s+the\s+key\s+issue\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ver 2.0 is the key issue (score: 1): Author: Randy K4QO <k4qo@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:34:53 -0400; I'm not faulting TT for having a new version of radio. That *is* a normal and healthy thing for them to do and everyone agrees on that. What I think is bothering folks like me is the fact that they d; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00677.html (7,921 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.0 is the key issue (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:11:19 -0400; My logic reaches the opposite conclusion. They do want to test v2 on the Orion I and the v2 firmware release will not be tied to the Orion II release. How about a 24 hour hiatus from further assumpti; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00688.html (7,898 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.0 is the key issue (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:14:05 -0700; Randy, what do you mean "release"? Nothing is released yet. There was a preliminary announcement of a new radio scheduled to ship in October. Any speculation that Ver. 2 code will ship before or afte; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00689.html (9,425 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]