Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Vee\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Vee\s+Beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Vee Beam (score: 1): Author: Dave Tipton <dave@lodave.org>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT); Anyone here actually using the Vee Beam that is being offered on TenTec's site? I see that B&W also offers an end fed version that is similar. Just curious to see if anyone has an opinion about the d; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00122.html (9,359 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Vee Beam (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <Mike_N4NT@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:06:49 -0400; the vee beam isn't rated for qro. 73, Mike N4NT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00124.html (9,916 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Vee Beam (score: 1): Author: Dave Tipton <dave@lodave.org>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:10:21 -0700 (PDT); Oof.. 250 Watts on SSB and 100Watts on CW... Didn't notice that. Thanks for the catch. Guess I should check out the B&W.. It'll handle legal limit.. (I can only do 500 Watts SSB and about 400 CW righ; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00125.html (10,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]